'Connecting Language and Disciplinary Knowledge in English for Specific Purposes: Case Studies in Law', by Alissa J. Hartig
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.37650Keywords:
case studies, law, languageAbstract
Connecting Language and Disciplinary Knowledge in English for Specific Purposes: Case Studies in Law, by Alissa J. Hartig (2017), Multilingual Matters xi +191 pp
References
Cheng, L. (2010) A semiotic interpretation of genre: court judgments as an example. Semiotica 182: 89-113. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2010.053
Cheng, L. and Cheng, W. (2014) Epistemic modality in court judgments: a corpus-driven comparison of civil cases in Hong Kong and Scotland. English for Specific Purposes 33: 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.07.006
Cheng, L. and Sin, K. K. (2009) Legal terms across communities: divergence behind convergence in law. In A. Wagner and V. K. Bhatia (eds) Diversity and Tolerance in Socio-Legal Context: Explorations in the Semiotics of Law 181-190. London: Ashgate.
Goodwin, C. (1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96(3): 606-633. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
Irmscher, W. F. (1979) Teaching Expository Writing. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Lantolf, J. P. and Thorne, S. L. (2006) Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Monte-Sano, C. (2010) Disciplinary literacy in history: an exploration of the historical nature of adolescents' writing. Journal of the Learning Sciences 19(4): 539-568. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.481014
Northcott, J. (2013) Legal English. In B. Paltridge and S. Starfield (eds) The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes 213-216. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Wendt, M. (2003) Context, culture and construction: research implications of theory formation in foreign language methodology. In M. Byram and P. Grundy (eds) Context and Culture in Language Teaching and Learning 92-105. New York: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596728-010
Zamel, V. (1983) The composing processes of advanced ESL students: six case-studies. TESOL Quarterly 17(2): 165-187. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586647
Cheng, L. and Cheng, W. (2014) Epistemic modality in court judgments: a corpus-driven comparison of civil cases in Hong Kong and Scotland. English for Specific Purposes 33: 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.07.006
Cheng, L. and Sin, K. K. (2009) Legal terms across communities: divergence behind convergence in law. In A. Wagner and V. K. Bhatia (eds) Diversity and Tolerance in Socio-Legal Context: Explorations in the Semiotics of Law 181-190. London: Ashgate.
Goodwin, C. (1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96(3): 606-633. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
Irmscher, W. F. (1979) Teaching Expository Writing. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Lantolf, J. P. and Thorne, S. L. (2006) Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Monte-Sano, C. (2010) Disciplinary literacy in history: an exploration of the historical nature of adolescents' writing. Journal of the Learning Sciences 19(4): 539-568. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.481014
Northcott, J. (2013) Legal English. In B. Paltridge and S. Starfield (eds) The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes 213-216. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Wendt, M. (2003) Context, culture and construction: research implications of theory formation in foreign language methodology. In M. Byram and P. Grundy (eds) Context and Culture in Language Teaching and Learning 92-105. New York: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596728-010
Zamel, V. (1983) The composing processes of advanced ESL students: six case-studies. TESOL Quarterly 17(2): 165-187. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586647
Downloads
Published
2018-12-07
Issue
Section
Book Reviews
How to Cite
Cheng, L., & Pei, J. (2018). ’Connecting Language and Disciplinary Knowledge in English for Specific Purposes: Case Studies in Law’, by Alissa J. Hartig. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 25(2), 257-263. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.37650
