Problems of voice line-ups

Authors

  • Ann Stuart Laubstein Carleton University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v4i2.262

Keywords:

forensic linguistics, voice identification, ear witness, voice line-ups

Abstract

This paper describes an experimental study which investigates the viability of the currently accepted 'transcript method' in the preparation of voice (ear witness) line-ups. Two such line-ups were built by the Ottawa Police in a recent investigation and both these line-ups are experimentally examined for bias. Subjects (n=72, n=90) were asked to respond to a number of questions about the voices in the line-ups and in both cases the suspect's voice was judged significantly different from the foil voices. There appear to be a number of problems with this method- indeed it is not clear that it is capable of producing an unbiased line-up. Given our current knowledge about perceptual voice identification there appear to be good reasons for limiting the Canadian legal system's use of ear witness line-ups.

Author Biography

  • Ann Stuart Laubstein, Carleton University
    ANN STUART LAUBSTEIN is Associate Professor of Linguistics in the School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. She also has a cross appointment in Carleton's Cognitive Science Programme where she teaches and supervises doctoral students. This latter appointment reflects the rather eclectic nature of her research which has included work in second language acquisition, production models, speech recognition algorithms and voice recognition. Her current research is focused on sub-lexical structure.

Published

1997-12-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Laubstein, A. S. (1997). Problems of voice line-ups. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 4(2), 262-279. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v4i2.262