The structure of forensic handwriting and signature comparisons

Authors

  • Bryan Found La Trobe University
  • David Dick Australian Federal Police Forensic Services Division
  • Doug Rogers La Trobe University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v1i2.183

Keywords:

Signature comparison, forensic handwriting comparison

Abstract

The method of comparing questioned to known handwriting and signature formations is complex in that there are many steps where subjective judgements need to be made. With the introduction of computer aided examinations, more information should become available to the examiner on which to base subjective decisions. It is unlikely however that the majority of these subjective steps will be excluded. Decisions as to the consistency of a given questioned image to a body of standard images are based almost entirely on an individual's ability to make reasoned choices in view of the limitations of the technique that they are performing. This article summarizes a method used to compare handwriting in the forensic environment and is primarily aimed at forensic practitioners who are new to document examination or related disciplines and to individuals with a legal background who require a basic understanding of the structure of forensic handwriting examination.

Author Biographies

  • Bryan Found, La Trobe University
    Bryan Found (BSc, DipEd, GradDip, Neurosci) is a forensic handwriting consultant and is conducting Doctoral research in the School of Human Biosciences, La Trobe University. He has previously held the position of Section Head in both the Fraud and General Crime sections of the Document Examination Branch, State Forensic Science Laboratory, Victoria, Australia. He is involved in pure research into the neuroscience of handwriting and applied research into forensic handwriting examinations. He is the designer of the 'Pattern Evidence Analysis Toolbox' (PEAT) computer program for the objective comparison of handwriting traces.
  • David Dick, Australian Federal Police Forensic Services Division
    David Dick is a forensic document examiner in the Australian Federal Police Forensic Services Division, Melbourne Office. He is currently investigating the field of forensic handwriting examination from many perspectives, including psychophysiology. He specializes in the application of objective measurement techniques in handwriting comparisons and the implementation of appropriate procedures within a forensic police environment.
  • Doug Rogers, La Trobe University
    Douglas Rogers (BSc, PhD) is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Human Biosciences, La Trobe University specializing in the relationship between the brain and motor behaviour. He is involved in forensic handwriting research and development with particular emphasis on the objective comparison of handwriting traces related to forensic examinations.

Published

1994-12-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Found, B., Dick, D., & Rogers, D. (1994). The structure of forensic handwriting and signature comparisons. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 1(2), 183-196. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v1i2.183