Developing an Autobiographical Elicitation Methodology to Explore Lived Religion among Evangelical Christians Working in Healthcare in England
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/firn.22823Keywords:
Qualitative Methods, Lived Religion, Healthcare, Semi-structured interviewing, Autobiographical Elicitation, Elicitation, Narrative Turn, EvangelicalismAbstract
This article describes the rationale behind and development of a novel methodological combination of autobiographical reflection and semi-structured interviewing. The resulting “autobiographical elicitation” methodology was first used for a recent study of the relationship between work and faith as experienced by evangelical medics working in the National Health Service (NHS) in England. The article argues that autobiographical elicitation successfully fulfilled aims of facilitating lived religion research and generating qualitative data which was directed by what research participants deemed important and meaningful, while remaining conducive to comparative analysis. It also alleviated concerns regarding the limited reflection time offered by semi-structured interviews in isolation, and offered busy participants welcomed convenience and flexibility. The article concludes, therefore, that autobiographical elicitation is a promising methodological combination for lived religion researchers, and more broadly for those keen to generate rich qualitative insights in partnership with busy participants.
Downloads
References
Allport, Gordon W. 1960. The Individual and His Religion. London: Macmillan.
Ammerman, Nancy Tatom. 2014. Sacred Stories, Spiritual Tribes: Finding Religion in Everyday Life. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199896448.001.0001
Ammerman, Nancy T. (ed.). 2007. Everyday Religion: Observing Modern Lives. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305418.001.0001
Ammerman, Nancy T., and Roman R. Williams. 2012. Speaking of Methods: Eliciting Religious Narratives through Interviews, Photos, and Oral Diaries. In Annual Review of the Sociology of Religion, edited by Ole Riis and Luigi Berzano, 117–34. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047429470_007
Astley, Jeff. 2002. Ordinary Theology: Looking, Listening and Learning in Theology. Explorations in Pastoral, Practical and Empirical Theology. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Bagnoli, Anna. 2009. Beyond the Standard Interview: The Use of Graphic Elicitation and Arts-Based Methods. Qualitative Research 9(5): 547–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109343625
Bennett, Julia. 2013. Researching the Intangible: A Qualitative Phenomenological Study of the Everyday Practices of Belonging. Sociological Research Online 18(4). http://www.socresonline.org.uk/19/1/10.html https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3187
Bochner, Arthur P. 2001. Narrative’s Virtues. Qualitative Inquiry 7(2): 131–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700201
Chase, Susan E. 2011. Still a Field in the Making: Narrative Inquiry. In SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4th ed., edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 421–34. Thousand Oaks; London: SAGE.
Clark, Cindy Dell. 1999. The Autodriven Interview: A Photographic Viewfinder into Children’s Experience. Visual Sociology 14(1): 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725869908583801
Coar, Luan, and Julius Sim. 2006. Interviewing One’s Peers: Methodological Issues in a Study of Health Professionals. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 24(4): 251–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813430601008479
Comstock, Gary L. 1987. Two Types of Narrative Theology. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 55(4): 687–717. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1464681
Connolly, Peter (ed.). 1999. Approaches to the Study of Religion. London; New York: Cassell.
Davie, Grace. 2013. Methodological Challenges. In The Sociology of Religion: A Critical Agenda, 2nd ed., edited by Grace Davie, 112–33. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Davies, Charlotte Aull. 2008. Reflexive Ethnography: A Guided to Researching Selves and Others. 2nd ed. Abingdon; New York: Routledge.
Deakin, Hannah, and Kelly Wakefield. 2014. Skype Interviewing: Reflections of Two PhD Researchers. Qualitative Research 14(5): 603–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113488126
Denscombe, Martyn. 2003. The Good Research Guide for Small-Scale Social Research Projects. 2nd ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Droogers, A. F., and Anton van Harskamp (eds). 2014. Methods for the Study of Religious Change: From Religious Studies to Worldview Studies. Sheffield; Bristol, CT: Equinox.
Dunlop, Sarah L., and Pete Ward. 2015. Narrated Photography: Visual Representations of the Sacred among Young Polish Migrants in England. Fieldwork in Religion 9(1): 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1558/fiel.v9i1.30
Fivush, Robyn. 2013. Religious Narratives, Identity, and Well-Being in American Adolescents. In Religious Voices in Self-Narratives, edited by Marjo Buitelaar and Hetty Zock, 105–28. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511700.105
Gauntlett, David, and Peter Holzwarth. 2006. Creative and Visual Methods for Exploring Identities. Visual Studies 21(1): 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860600613261
Guest, Mathew. 2008. Evangelical Identity and Contemporary Culture: A Congregational Study in Innovation. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock.
Guest, Mathew, Kristin Aune, Sonya Sharma and Rob Warner. 2013. Christianity and the University Experience: Understanding Student Faith. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Guillemin, Marilys, and Sarah Drew. 2010. Questions of Process in Participant-Generated Visual Methodologies. Visual Studies 25(2): 175–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2010.502676
Hart, Patrick. 2016. Theory, Method, and Madness in Religious Studies. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 28(1): 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341346
Henwood, Karen, Nick Pidgeon, Karen Parkhill and Peter Simmons. 2011. Researching Risk: Narrative, Biography, Subjectivity. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung 36(4): 251–72. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23032293
Hollway, Wendy, and Tony Jefferson. 1997. Eliciting Narrative through the In-Depth Interview. Qualitative Inquiry 3(1): 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F107780049700300103
Houghton, Catherine, Dympna Casey, David Shaw and Kathy Murphy. 2013. Rigour in Qualitative Case-Study Research. Nurse Researcher 20(4): 12–17. https://journals.rcni.com/nurse-researcher/rigour-in-qualitative-casestudy-researchnr2013.03.20.4.12.e326
Knott, Kim. 1994. Women Researching, Women Researched: Gender as an Issue in the Empirical Study of Religion. In Religion and Gender, edited by Ursula King, 199–218. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons.
Lawler, Steph. 2002. Narrative in Social Research. In Qualitative Research in Action, edited by Tim May, 242–59. London: SAGE.
Lo Iacono, Valeria, Paul Symonds and David H. K. Brown. 2016. Skype as a Tool for Qualitative Research Interviews. Sociological Research Online 21(2): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5153%2Fsro.3952
Luckmann, Thomas. 1967. The Invisible Religion: The Problem of Religion in Modern Society. New York: Macmillan.
Malterud, Kirsti, and hanne Hollnagel. 2007. Avoiding Humiliations in the Clinical Encounter. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 25(2): 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813430701237721
May, Tim. 2011. Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process. 4th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
McGuire, Meredith B. 2008. Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mustafa, Asma. 2014. Faith and Photography: Using Auto-Photography in Eliciting Perceptions of Religious Identity. Fieldwork in Religion 9(2): 166–81. https://doi.org/10.1558/firn.v9i2.14821
Notermans, Catrien, and Heleen Kommers. 2013. Researching Religion: The Iconographic Elicitation Method. Qualitative Research 13(5): 608–25. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1468794112459672
Pearce, Lisa D., and Melinda Lundquist Denton. 2011. A Faith of Their Own: Stability and Change in the Religiosity of America’s Adolescents. New York: Oxford University Press.
Riley, Jennifer. 2020. “It’s a fraught subject”: Listening to Evangelical Doctors Talk about Abortion. Journal of the British Association for the Study of Religions 22(1): 89–108. https://doi.org/10.18792/jbasr.v22i0.49
Roof, Wade Clark. 1993. Religion and Narrative. Review of Religious Research 34(4): 297–310. https://doi.org/10.2307/3511969
Schielke, Joska Samuli and Liza Debevec (eds). 2012. Ordinary Lives and Grand Schemes: An Anthropology of Everyday Religion. EASA Series 18. New York: Berghahn Books.
Seitz, Sally. 2016. Pixilated Partnerships, Overcoming Obstacles in Qualitative Interviews via Skype: A Research Note. Qualitative Research 16(2): 229–35. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1468794115577011
Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. 1978. The Meaning and End of Religion. London: SPCK.
Stausberg, Michael, and Steven Engler. 2011. Introduction. In Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion, edited by Michael Stausberg and Steven Engler, 3–20. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.5840/asrr20123212
Stringer, Martin D. 2008. Contemporary Western Ethnography and the Definition of Religion. Continuum Advances in Religious Studies. London: Continuum.
Stroup, George W. 1975. Bibliographical Critique. Theology Today 32(2): 133–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/004057367503200202
Williams, Roman R. 2010. Space for God: Lived Religion at Work, Home and Play. Sociology of Religion 71(3): 257–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srq048
Williams, Roman R., and Kyle Whitehouse. 2015. Photo Elicitation and the Visual Sociology of Religion. Review of Religious Research 57: 303–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-014-0199-5
Wilson, Tom. 2015. Researching Lived Islam as an Evangelical Anglican Minister: How Truthful, How Forthright and How Static Should I Be? Fieldwork in Religion 10(1): 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1558/firn.v10i1.24543
Yamane, David. 2000. Narrative and Religious Experience. Sociology of Religion 61(2): 171–89. https://doi.org/10.2307/3712284
