Psychological Types of Male and Female Lay Church Leaders in England, Compared with United Kingdom Population Norms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/firn.v1i1.69Keywords:
psychological types, evangelical, United KingdomAbstract
A sample of 322 evangelical lay church leaders completed Form G (Anglicized) of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Among the female church leaders extraversion and introversion were equally represented. There were preferences for sensing over intuition, for feeling over thinking, and for judging over perceiving. Among the male church leaders there were preferences for introversion over extraversion, intuition over sensing, for thinking over feeling, and for judging over perceiving. The type preferences of the current samples were statistically analysed in comparison with the United Kingdom population norms (Kendall, 1998). It was found that evangelical lay church leaders differ from the United Kingdom population in a number of significant ways; most notably, intuitive types are significantly over-represented among both male and female evangelical lay church leaders compared to the United Kingdom population norms.
Downloads
References
Butler, A., 1999, Personality and Communicating the Gospel. Cambridge: Grove Books.
Carlson, J.G., 1989, ‘Affirmative: In support of Researching the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator’. Journal of Counseling and Development 67: 484-86.
Craig, C.L., T. Horsfall and L.J. Francis, 2004, ‘Psychological Types of Male Evangelical Missionary Personnel Training in England: A Role for Thinking Type Men?’. Pastoral Psychology: (in press).
Duncan, B., 1993, Pray your Way. London: Darton, Longman & Todd.
Fowke, R., 1997, Finding your Prayer Personality. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.
Francis, L.J., 2003, ‘Psychological Type and Biblical Hermeneutics: SIFT Methods of Preaching’. Rural Theology 1.1: 13-23.
Francis, L.J., and P. Atkins, 2000, Exploring Luke’s Gospel: A Guide to the Gospel Readings in the Revised Common Lectionary. London: Mowbray.
—2001, Exploring Matthew’s Gospel: A Guide to the Gospel Readings in the Revised Common Lectionary. London: Mowbray.
—2002, Exploring Mark’s Gospel: An Aid for Readers and Preachers Using Year B of the Revised Common Lectionary. London: Continuum.
Francis, L.J., A. Butler and C.L. Craig, 2004, ‘Psychological Types of Male Evangelical Anglican Seminarians in England’. Journal of Psychological Type: (in press).
Francis, L.J., and S.H. Jones, 1999, ‘The Scale Properties of the MBTI Form G (Anglicised) among Adult Churchgoers’. Pastoral Sciences 18: 107-26.
Francis, L.J., V.J. Payne and S.H. Jones, 2001, ‘Psychological Types of Male Anglican Clergy in Wales’. Journal of Psychological Type 56: 19-23.
Francis, L.J., A.W. Penson and S.H. Jones, 2001, ‘Psychological Types of Male and Female Bible College Students in England’. Mental Health, Religion and Culture 4: 23-32.
Goldsmith, M., 1994, Knowing Me - Knowing God: Exploring your Spirituality with Myers-Briggs. London: SPCK.
Goldsmith, M., and M. Wharton, 1993, Knowing Me_Knowing You: Exploring Personality Type and Temperament. London: SPCK.
Innes, R., 1996, Personality Indicators and the Spiritual Life. Cambridge: Grove Books.
Jung, C.G.,1971, Psychological Types: The Collected Works, VI. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kendall, E., 1998, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Step 1 Manual Supplement. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Kline, P., 2000, Handbook of Psychological Testing. London: Routledge.
Levy, N., and S.E. Ridley, 1987, ‘Stability of Jungian Personality Types within a College Population over a Decade’. Psychological Reports 60: 419-22.
Myers, I.B., 2000, Introduction to Type. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
Myers, I.B., and M.H. McCaulley, 1985, Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Osborn, L., and D. Osborn, 1991, God’s Diverse People: Personality and the Christian Life. London: Daybreak.
Salter, D.W., N.J. Evans and D.S. Forney, 1997, ‘Test-Retest of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: An Examination of Dominant Functioning’. Educational and Psychological Measurement 57(4): 590-97.
Saward, M., 1987, Evangelicals on the Move. London: Mowbray.