ACTIVE NON-VIOLENCE AS CONFLICT RESOLUTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/eph.v18i2.51Keywords:
humanism, metaphysics, religion, technologyAbstract
Science has developed technology to the point that computers are networked, “talking” to each other and artificial intelligence is a real possibility in the future. In a parallel development, nanotechnology examines interaction on a subparticle level, too small to be seen. Yet, humankind is lagging in development of social co-operation and communication. Violence is still the “weapon of choice” on a personal level as well as a national level. Two major developments seek to address conflict resolution. On a personal level, Marshall B. Rosenburg’s study of Nonviolent Communication seeks to facilitate individual interaction. And on the macro level, Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr’s work in Passive Resistance has had great success in social change without loss of life. This article, in an effort to promote civil discourse asks the questions: How do these two movements relate to each other? Is there a point of connection which may offer a window through which individuals and groups might resolve conflict successfully?
References
Lamont, Chris. “Justice and Transition in Mississippi: Opening the Books on the American South.” Politics 30 (3): 181-190.
Nagler, Michael. The Steps of Nonviolence. New York: Fellowship of Reconciliation, 1999.
Nagler, Michael N., Is There No Other Way? The Search for a Nonviolent Future. Makawao, HI: Inner Ocean Publishing, 2001.
Rosenberg, Marshall B. Non-violent Communication: A Language of Life. Encinitas, CA: Puddle Dancer Press, 2003.