KANT AND THE BIOTECHNOLOGY REVOLUTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/eph.v16i2.101Keywords:
biotechnology, humanism, ethicsAbstract
.
References
Eagleton, Terry. The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.
Francis Fukuyama. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Picador, 2002.
Genetics and Public Policy Center Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: A Discussion of Challenges, Concerns, and Preliminary Policy Options Related to the Genetic Testing of Human Embryos. Washington D.C.: Genetics and Public Policy Center, 2004.
Habermas, Jürgen. The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003.
———, The Structural Transformations in the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991.
Heidegger, Martin. Kant and das Problem der Metaphysik (1929).
Henrich, Dieter. “Origins of the Theory of the Subject” in Philosophical Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. Edited by Honneth, McCarthy, Offe, and Wellmer. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1992.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. 1790.
———, Critique of Practical Reason. Mary Gregor, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
———, Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Norman Kemp Smith. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1929.
———, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. 1785.
———, “What is Enlightenment?” 1784.
Landmann, Michael Philosophische Anthropologie: Menschliche Selbstdarstellung in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Auflage, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1982.
Makkreel, Rudolf. Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutic Import of the Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1995.
Pinker, Steven. The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Penguin Books, 2002.
Schneewind, Jerome B. “Why Study Kant’s Ethics?” in Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Allen W. Wood, ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002.
Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.
Zammito, John H. Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.
Francis Fukuyama. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Picador, 2002.
Genetics and Public Policy Center Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: A Discussion of Challenges, Concerns, and Preliminary Policy Options Related to the Genetic Testing of Human Embryos. Washington D.C.: Genetics and Public Policy Center, 2004.
Habermas, Jürgen. The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003.
———, The Structural Transformations in the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991.
Heidegger, Martin. Kant and das Problem der Metaphysik (1929).
Henrich, Dieter. “Origins of the Theory of the Subject” in Philosophical Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. Edited by Honneth, McCarthy, Offe, and Wellmer. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1992.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. 1790.
———, Critique of Practical Reason. Mary Gregor, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
———, Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Norman Kemp Smith. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1929.
———, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. 1785.
———, “What is Enlightenment?” 1784.
Landmann, Michael Philosophische Anthropologie: Menschliche Selbstdarstellung in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Auflage, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1982.
Makkreel, Rudolf. Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutic Import of the Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1995.
Pinker, Steven. The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Penguin Books, 2002.
Schneewind, Jerome B. “Why Study Kant’s Ethics?” in Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Allen W. Wood, ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002.
Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.
Zammito, John H. Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.
Published
2013-10-09
Issue
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Thomas, B. (2013). KANT AND THE BIOTECHNOLOGY REVOLUTION. Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism, 16(2), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.1558/eph.v16i2.101
