Other-correction and epistemic imbalances in teacher–student interactions

Authors

  • Min Li Nankai University
  • Yang Yue Nankai University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.27264

Keywords:

other-correction, epistemics, teacher-student interaction, turn sequences

Abstract

Other-correction is a ubiquitous phenomenon in language, and has been extensively studied in conversation analysis and pragmatics. Nevertheless, the conditions of its occurrence still remain unclear. Based on Heritage’s theory of epistemics, the study unveils four distinct epistemic interaction patterns in which other-correction takes place, and endeavours to elucidate their associations with trouble sources, correction strategies, and correction positions. Empirical findings indicate that different epistemic interaction patterns of other-correction exhibit no discernible link with trouble sources, but manifest a statistically significant correlation with correction strategies and correction positions.

Author Biographies

  • Min Li, Nankai University

    Min Li is Professor of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics at Nankai University. His research interests include pragmatics and foreign language education studies, on which he has published extensively in Chinese as well as international journals. His recent publications include articles in Applied Linguistics, SAGE Open Multilingua, Foreign Language Teaching and Research, etc.

  • Yang Yue, Nankai University

    Yang Yue is a PhD candidate of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics at Nankai University. She has published several articles in Discourse Studies and other journals.

References

Antaki, C. (2013). Recipient-side test questions. Discourse Studies, 15(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612466450

Batlle, J., & Deal, M. (2021). Teacher epistemic stance as a trouble in foreign language classroom interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 176, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.023

Bolden, G. B. (2018). Speaking “out of turn”: Epistemics in action in other-initiated repair. Discourse Studies, 20(1), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617734346

Dippold, D. (2014). “That’s wrong”: Repair and rapport in culturally diverse higher education classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 402–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12061.x

Drew, P. (2018). Epistemics: The rebuttal special issue: An introduction. Discourse Studies, 20(1): 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617739742

Heller, V. (2017). Managing knowledge claims in classroom discourse: The public construction of a homogeneous epistemic status. Classroom Discourse, 8(2),156–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2017.1328699

Heritage, J. (2011). Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 159–183). Cambridge University Press.

Heritage, J. (2012a). The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685

Heritage, J. (2012b). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684

Heritage, J. (2013a). Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds. Discourse Studies, 15, 547–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613501449

Heritage, J. (2013b). Epistemics in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 370–394). Wiley-Blackwell.

Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103

Jefferson, G. (1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button & J. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 86–100). Multilingual Matters.

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). John Benjamins.

Jefferson, G. (2007). Preliminary notes on abdicated other-correction. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.006

Koole, T. (2012). The epistemics of student problems in a multi-lingual class. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(13), 1902–1916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.006

Kitzinger, C. (2013). Repair. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 229–256). Wiley-Blackwell.

Kurhila, S. (2001). Correction in talk between native and non-native speaker. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(7), 1083–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00048-5

McHoul, A. (1990). The organization of repair in classroom talk. Language in Society, 19, 349–377. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001455X

Pollner, M. (1975). “The very coinage of your brain”: The anatomy of reality disjunctures. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 5, 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839317500500304

Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J. (2013). Preference. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210–229). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Ran, Y. P., & Hou, H. B. (2009). Renji chongtu xia yinhan xiuzheng yongyi de yuyong fenxi (A pragmatic account of implicit repairs in interpersonal conflicts). Waiyu jiaoxue yu yanjiu (Foreign Language Teaching and Research), 41(6), 403–409 + 480.

Ren, Y. X. (2013). Xueshu jianyi Zhong zhuanjia geren shenfen jiangou de shunyingxing yanjiu (Experts’ identity construction in academic advising sequences according to linguistic adaptation theory). Waiyu yu waiyu jiaoxue (Foreign Languages and their Teaching), 6, 6–10.

Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 54–69). Multilingual Matters.

Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in Interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041

Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289

Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43, 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903471258

Terasaki, A. (2004 [1976]). Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 171–223). John Benjamins.

Wang, X. Y., & Wang, J. J. (2014). Waiyu huanjing xia tongban taqi xiuzheng yanjiu (A study of peer other-initiated repairs in foreign language environment. Xiandai Waiyu (Linguistics & Applied Linguistics), 37(2), 210–220 + 292–293.

Published

2024-08-13

How to Cite

Li, M., & Yue, Y. (2024). Other-correction and epistemic imbalances in teacher–student interactions. East Asian Pragmatics, 9(2), 323-345. https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.27264