Exploring disclaimers on Chinese social networking sites from a metapragmatic perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.24631Keywords:
metapragmatics, disclaimers, online social interaction, Chinese culture, rapport managementAbstract
This study explores the employment of disclaimers as metapragmatic devices in online interpersonal interaction on a Chinese social networking site, Weibo. Previous studies discussed meta-negation disclaimers and meta-prohibition disclaimers. This study establishes a new type of disclaimer: meta-condition disclaimers. It examines the forms and functions of the three types of disclaimers. Prior studies explained disclaimers as either prospective moves or retrospective moves. This study further introduces disclaimers as conjunctive moves, which bridge the speaker’s ongoing communicative behaviour. Also, it investigates the communicative purposes of using disclaimers, revealing that disclaimers are mainly employed by Chinese netizens to convey criticism. Furthermore, this research probes into the underlying cultural factors of employing disclaimers. It uncovers certain values ingrained in Chinese culture, such as ren (kindheartedness), yi (righteousness) and li (politeness). The study contributes to a global understanding of disclaimers and could provide some insights into online rapport management.
References
Abdi, R. (2012). Smoothing the rough edges. Pragmatics, 22(3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22.3.01abd
Ajayi, T. M. (2022). Metapragmatic disclaimers in Yoruba discursive interactions. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 40(2), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2022.2049834
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogical imagination: Four essays. Houston, TX: Texas University Press. https://doi.org/10.7560/715271
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511813085
Bublitz, W., & Hübler, A. (2007). Metapragmatics in use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.165
Bury, B., Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2014). Directing gaze: The effect of disclaimer labels on women’s visual attention to fashion magazine advertisements. Body Image, 11(4), 357–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.06.004
Caffi, C. (1994). Metapragmatics. In R. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of languages and linguistics (pp. 60–102). Oxford: Pergamon and Aberdeen University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-08-044854-2/00317-5
Caffi, C. (1999). On mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 881–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(98)00098-8
Caffi, C. (2007). Mitigation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Chen, X. (2022). Metapragmatics and the Chinese language. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Cragg, D. N., Mulgrew, K. E., & Kannis-Dymand, L. (2019). Can disclaimer labels or Dove Evolution commercial mitigate negative effects of thin-ideal exposure? Journal of Health Psychology, 24(7), 918–928. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105317690037
Culpeper, J., & Haugh, M. (2014). Pragmatics and the English language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.04.009
Fitzgerald, R., Sandel, T., & Wu, X. (2022). Chinese social media: Technology, culture and creativity. Discourse, Context & Media, 48, 100610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100610
Frank, J. (1990). You call that a rhetorical question? Journal of Pragmatics, 14(5), 723–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90003-v
Fraser, B. (1980). Conversational mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics, 4(4), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(80)90029-6
Georgakopoulou, A. (2017). “Whose context collapse?”: Ethical clashes in the study of language and social media in context. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(2–3). https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-1034
Goroshko, O., & Poliakova, T. (2018). Persuasiveness in political discourse on Twitter. Psycholinguistics, 24(2), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2018-24-2-29-46
Hewitt, J. P., & Stokes, R. (1975). Disclaimers. American Sociological Review, 40(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094442
Hongladarom, K. (2007). “Don’t blame me for criticising you …”: a study of metapragmatic comments in Thai. In W. Bublitz & A. Hübler (Eds.), Metapragmatics in use. (pp. 29–48). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.165.04hon
Liu, P., & Liu, H. (2021). Salience adjusting: Metapragmatic expressions in complaint responses. Journal of Pragmatics, 176, 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.003
Lucy, J. (1993). Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511621031
Mao, Y., & Zhao, X. (2020). By the mitigation one knows the doctor: Mitigation strategies by Chinese doctors in online medical consultation. Health Communication, 35(6), 667–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1582312
Markham, A., & Buchanan,E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (v2.0). http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf
Overstreet, M., & Yule, G. (2001). Formulaic disclaimers. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00125-3
Overstreet, M., & Yule, G. (2002). The metapragmatics of and everything. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(6), 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(01)00036-4
PRC. (2017). Top 10 Chinese media buzzwords of 2017 released. 19 December. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/201712/t20171219_321948.html
Ran, Y. (2015). Metapragmatic negation as a rapport-oriented mitigating device. Journal of Pragmatics, 84, 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.004
Ren, W., & Guo, Y. (2020). Self-praise on Chinese social networking sites. Journal of Pragmatics, 169, 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.009
Silverstein, M. (1993). Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In A. L. John (Ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics(pp. 33–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004
Sullivan, J. (2014). China’s Weibo: Is faster different? New Media & Society, 16(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812472966
Tanskanen, S. (2007). Metapragmatic utterances in computer-mediated interaction. In W. Bublitz & A. Hübler (Eds.), Metapragmatics in use. (pp. 87–106). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Tayebi, T., & Parvaresh, V. (2014). Conversational disclaimers in Persian. Journal of Pragmatics, 62, 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.011
Verschueren, J. (1995). Metapragmatics. In J. Verschueren, J. Ostman and J. Blommaert (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics manual (pp. 367–371). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m.met1
Verschueren, J. (2000). Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. Pragmatics, 10(4), 439-456. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.10.4.02ver
Yang, K. (2021). Disclaimer as a metapragmatic device in Chinese: A corpus-based study. Journal of Pragmatics, 173, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.011
Yuan, Z. (2018). Exploring Chinese college students’ construction of online identity on the Sina Microblog. Discourse, Context & Media, 26, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.02.001
Yucel, M., & Vaish, A. (2021). Eliciting forgiveness. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews – Cognitive Science, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1572
Zhu, Y. (2015). The role of qing (positive emotions) and li 1 (rationality) in Chinese entrepreneurial decision making: A Confucian Ren-Yi wisdom perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(4), 613–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1970-1
