Prisoner education and prisoner’s multi?scalarity of identity negotiated from penitentiary discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.24473Keywords:
identity, identity transformation, social constructionist view, prisoner education, penitentiary discourseAbstract
The growing interest in identity and language, coupled with increased interest in the relation between identity, language and education, has resulted in a rich amount of work that has informed education, identity and language. To keep abreast of the developments in identity research, the authors propose the research on prisoners’ identity changing from structuralism on identity as a set of generically inherent characteristics to social constructionist perspectives on identity as fluid and emerging in interaction. From the social constructionist perspective on identity, the prisoner’s multi-scalarity of identity is identified through the negotiation from penitentiary discourse indicating that the prisoners inhabit various identities in accordance with the discourses and discursive varieties that they are using, which requires us to alter the lens of seeing prisoners as having a single and stable identity of “Prisoner”. Prisoners’ fluid identity transformed from the legally fixed “prisoner” to the socially acceptable “people”, between which there is prisoners’ multi-scalarity of fluid identity, plays an important role in prisoners’ rehabilitation and socialisation. The successful identity transformation from “prisoner” to “people” means the efficient rehabilitating process of the prison for prisoners. The process of identity circulation has pedagogical implications for prisoner education.
References
Abrams, L. S., & Lea, C. H. (2016). Becoming employable: An ethnographic study of life skills courses in a men’s jail. The Prison Journal, 96(5), 667–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885516662627
Baxter, J. (2016). Positioning language and identity: Poststructuralist perspectives. In S. Preece (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and identity (pp. 34–49). London: Routledge.
Beinhoff, B., & Rasinger, S. M. (2016). The future of identity research: Impact and new development in sociolinguistics. In S. Preece (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and identity (pp. 572–585). London: Routledge.
Bucholtz, B., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407
Canagarajah, A. S. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. New York: Routledge.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Construing grounded theory. London: Sage.
Christie, N. (1981). Limits to pain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Czerniawski, G. (2016). A race to the bottom: Prison education and the English and Welsh policy context. Journal of Education Policy, 31(2), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1062146
Drummond, R., & Schleef, E. (2016). Identity in variationist sociolinguistics. In S. Preece (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and identity (pp. 50–65). London: Routledge.
Earle, C. S. (2016). Dispossessed: Prisoner response-ability and resistance at the limits of subjectivity. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 46(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2015.1104718
Gee, J. P. (2001). Identity as an analytical lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X025001099
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semiotic 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Gueta, K., & Chen, G. (2016). “I want to rebel, but there they hit me even harder”: Discourse analysis of Israeli women offenders’ accounts of their pathways to substance abuse and crime. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(7), 787–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x15595421
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Anti-language. In M. A. K. Halliday (Ed.), Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning (pp. 164–182). London: Edward Arnold.
Hart, E. L. (2016). Women prisoners and the drive for desistance: Capital and responsibilization as a barrier to change. Women & Criminal Justice, 0, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2016.1217814
Kamada, L. (2010). Hybrid identities and adolescent girls. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Kramsch, C., & Steffensen, S. V. (2008). Ecological perspectives on second language acquisition and socialization. In N. Hornberger & P. Nuff (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Language and socialization (pp. 10–26). Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
Martin, J. R. (2014). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd ed.). Beijing: Peking University Press.
Marzano, L., Ciclitira, K., & Alder, J. R. (2016). The non-suicidal self-harm amongst incarcerated men: A qualitative study. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 6(4), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcp-04-2016-0017
Mayr, A. (2004). Prison discourse: Language as a means of control and resistance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mcnamara, T. (1997). Theorizing social identity: What do we mean by social identity? Competing frameworks, competing discourses. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 561–567. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587838
Mora, A., Trejo, P., & Roux, R. (2014). English language teachers’ professional development and identities. Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 16(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v16n1.38153
Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Norton, M., & De Costa, P. I. (2018). Research tasks on identity in language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 51(1), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444817000325
Norton, B., & Morgan, B. (2013). Poststructuralism. In C. Chapelle (ed.). Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 55–75). London: Wiley-Blackwell.
Podgórecki, A. (1973). Knowledge and opinion about law. London: M. Robertson.
Preece, S. (2016). Introduction: Language and identity in applied linguistics. In S. Preece (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and identity (pp. 1–16). London: Routledge.
Scraton, P. (2016). Bearing witness to the “pain of others”: Researching power, violence, and resistance in a women’s prison. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v5i1.288
Seim, J. (2016). Short-timing: The carceral experience of soon-to-be-released prisoners. Punishment & Society, 0(00), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516641377
Uryu, M., Steffensen, S. V., & Kramsch, C. (2014). The ecology of intercultural interaction: Timescales, temporal ranges and identity dynamics. Language Sciences, 41, 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.006
Velez Young-Alfaro, M. (2017). Students as threats: Schooling inside a youth prison. Anthropology & Education, 48(3), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/aeq.12201
Vu, H. H. (2017). “Only when I am not ashamed of myself can I teach others”: Preservice English-language teachers in Vietnam and code-switching practices. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 2, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2017.1305906
Wahidin, A. (2004). Older women in the criminal justice system: Running out of time. London: Jessica Kingsley.
