Language reproduction and coordinated agency through resonant play

Authors

  • Hiroko Takanashi Japan Women's University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.23676

Keywords:

agency, affect, creativity, dialogic syntax, resonant play, stancetaking

Abstract

This article examines how creativity is jointly achieved in playful Japanese conversations, focusing on dialogicality in language form, meaning and the speaker’s agency. The analysis employs “dialogic syntax” and “stancetaking” as the theoretical frameworks of dialogicality and shows that dialogic engagement in talk-in-interaction engenders resonance, creating both similarities and contrasts in parallel structure across utterances. This study points out that such differentiations come from distinctive social actors situated in the indexical field of social life. Injecting stancetaking into dialogic syntax makes it possible to explicitly address the dialogic creation of socially meaningful language reproduction in tandem with constructing the stancetaker’s agency. Moreover, dialogic syntax and stancetaking shed important light on how a playful utterance creates priming effects, prepatterning the subsequent language reproduction in resonance, and prompting stancetakers’ affect to voluntarily contribute something new, engaging with the prior utterances, which develops the play framing activity and enhances shared pleasure.

Author Biography

  • Hiroko Takanashi, Japan Women's University

    Hiroko Takanashi is Professor in the Department of English at Japan Women’s University, Tokyo, where she teaches pragmatics, sociolinguistics, and English thesis writing pedagogy to undergraduate and graduate students. Her research interests lie in interactional sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology, and she has published articles on conversational framing and play, humor, and stancetaking.

References

Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.

Ahearn, L. M. (2003). Writing desire in Nepali love letters. Language & Communication, 23, 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0271-5309(02)00046-0

Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theories of humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Attardo, S. (2001). Humorous texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) [1934]. The dialogic imagination: Four essays, ed. M. Holquist, tr. C. Emerson & M. Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Bamberg, M. (1997). Language, concepts and emotions: The role of language in the construction of emotions. Language Sciences, 19(4), 309–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0388-0001(97)00004-1

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. San Francisco, CA: Chandler Publishing Company.

Becker, A. L. (1995). Beyond translation: Essays toward a modern philology. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Besnier, N. (1989). Literacy and feelings: The encoding of affect in Nukulaelae letters. Text, 9(1), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.69

Besnier, N. (1992). Reported speech and affect on Nukulaelae Atoll. In J. H. Hill & J. T. Irvine (Eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse (pp. 161–181). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 355–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6

Brody, M. J. (2019). Heightened discourse and dialogical syntax in Tojol-ab’al conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 29(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12229

Bucholtz, M. (2009). From stance to style: Gender, interaction, and indexicality in Mexican immigrant youth slang. In A. Jaffe (Ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 146–170). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2004). Language and identity. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 369–394). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Caillois, R. (1967). Les jeux et les hommes: Le masque et le vertige. Paris: Gallimard.

Chafe, W. (1984). Integration and involvement in spoken and written language. In T. Borbe (Ed.), Semiotics unfolding (pp. 1095–1102). Berlin: Mouton.

Chafe, W. (2007). The importance of not being earnest: The feeling behind laughter and humor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Davies, C. E. (2003). How English-learners joke with native speakers: An interactional sociolinguistic perspective on humor as collaborative discourse across cultures. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1361–1385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00181-9

Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 139–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Du Bois, J. W. (2014). Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 359–410. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0024

Du Bois, J. W., & Kärkkäinen, E. (2012). Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text & Talk, 32(4), 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2012-0021

Englebretson, R. (2007a). Stancetaking in discourse: An introduction. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 1–25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Englebretson, R. (Ed.). (2007b). Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ensink, T., & Sauer, C. (2003). Social-functional and cognitive approaches to discourse interpretation: The role of frame and perspective. In T. Ensink & C. Sauer (Eds.), Framing and perspectivising in discourse (pp. 1–21). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Fitzmaurice, S. M. (2004). Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the historical construction of interlocutor stance: From stance markers to discourse markers. Discourse Studies, 6(4), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604046585

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.

Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1992). Assessments and the construction of context. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 147–189). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among Black children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Goodwin, M. H. (2006). The hidden life of girls: Games of stance, status, and exclusion. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Hopper, R. (1995). Episode trajectory in conversational play. In P. ten Have & G. Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organisation of talk and embodied activities (pp. 57–71). Washington, DC.: University Press of America.

Huizinga, J. (2014) [1950]. Homo Ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. La Vergne, TN: Lightning Source Inc.

Irvine, J. T. (1990). Registering affect: Heteroglossia in the linguistic expression of emotion. In C. A. Lutz & L. Abu-Lughod (Eds.), Language and the politics of emotion (pp. 126–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Irvine, J. T. (2001). “Style” as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In P. Eckert & J. R. Rickford (Eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation (pp. 21–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jaffe, A. (2009a). Stance in a Corsican school: Institutional and ideological orders and the production of bilingual subjects. In A. Jaffe (Ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 119–145). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jaffe, A. (2009b). Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance. In A. Jaffe (Ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jaffe, A. (Ed.). (2009c). Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jakobson, R. (1981). Poetry of grammar and grammar of poetry. In S. Rudy (Ed.), Roman Jakobson selected writings, vol. 3: Poetry of grammar and grammar of poetry (pp. 87–97). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.

Kärkkäinen, E. (2006). Stance taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text & Talk, 26(6), 699–731. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2006.029

Kärkkäinen, E., & Du Bois, J. W. (Eds.). (2012). Stance, affect, and intersubjectivity in interaction: Sequential and dialogic perspectives. Special issue of Text & Talk, 32(4).

Kim, K. (2022). Syllabically-matched resonance in sound and category: An excursion into the poetics of ordinary talk in Korean. East Asian Pragmatics, 7(3).

Kim, M. (2022). Creative multimodal and multilingual puns as and through joint actions in Korean media interviews. East Asian Pragmatics, 7(3).

Kotthoff, H. (1999). Coherent keying in conversational humour: Contextualising joint fictionalisation. In W. Bublitz, U. Lenk & E. Ventola (Eds.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse: How to create it and how to describe it, Selected papers from the international workshop on coherence, Augsburg, 24–27 April 1997 (pp. 125–150). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kotthoff, H. (2006). Pragmatics of performance and the analysis of conversational humor. Humor, 19(3), 271–304. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor.2006.015

Li, X. (2020). Interpersonal touch and conversational joking. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(3), 357–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1786970

Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Norrick, N. R. (1993a). Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Norrick, N. R. (1993b). Repetition in canned jokes and spontaneous conversational joking. Humor, 6(4), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1786970

Ochs, E. (1986). From feelings to grammar: A Samoan case study. In B. B. Schieffelin & E. Ochs (Eds.), Language socialisation across cultures (pp. 251–272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oropeza-Escobar, M. (2011). Represented discourse, resonance and stance in joking interaction in Mexican Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ortner, S. B. (2006). Power and projects: Reflections on agency. In S. B. Ortner (Ed.), Anthropology and social theory: Culture, power, and the acting subject (pp. 129–153). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

Redfern, W. (1984). Puns. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sherzer, J. (1987). A discourse-centered approach to language and culture. American Anthropologist, 89(2), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1987.89.2.02a00010

Suzuki, R. (2020). Shinhyogen no soohatsu (Emergence of novel expressions). In T. Nakayama & N. Otani (Eds.), Ninchigengogaku to danwakinoogengogaku no yuukitekisetten (Toward dynamic interaction between cognitive linguistics and discoursefunctional linguistics) (pp. 183–207). Tokyo: Hituzi Publishers.

Takanashi, H. (2001). Stance differential in parallelism: Dialogic syntax of argumentation in Japanese. Pragmatics in 2000: Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, 2, 570–582.

Takanashi, H. (2007). Orthographic puns: The case of Japanese kyoka. Humor, 20(3), 235–259. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor.2007.012

Takanashi, H. (2011). Complementary stylistic resonance in Japanese play framing. Pragmatics, 21(2), 231–264. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21.2.04tak

Takanashi, H. (2020). Playful naming in playful framing: The intertextual emergence of neologism. In R. Ide & K. Hata (Eds.), Bonding through context: Language and interactional alignment in Japanese situated discourse (pp. 239–264). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.314.11tak

Takanashi, H. (2022). Emergent stance in walking tour discourse in Nara: The intersubjective construction of interculturality. In B. K. Sharma & S. Gao (Eds.), Language and intercultural communication in tourism: Critical perspectives (pp. 206–234). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003088028-13

Tannen, D. (2005) [1984]. Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tannen, D. (2007) [1989]. Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tannen, D., & Wallat, C. (1993). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Framing in discourse (pp. 57–76). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tao, H. (2020). NP clustering in Mandarin conversational interaction. In T. Ono & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The “noun phrase” across languages: An emergent unit in interaction (pp. 271–314). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Tao, H. (2022). Multimodal amusement resonance as a conversation interactional device: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese and English. East Asian Pragmatics, 7(3).

Verhagen, A. (2005). Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Voloshinov, V. N. (1973) [1929]. Marxism and the philosophy of language, tr. L. Matejka & I. R. Titunik. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Published

2022-10-24

How to Cite

Takanashi, H. (2022). Language reproduction and coordinated agency through resonant play. East Asian Pragmatics, 7(3), 395-423. https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.23676