A pragmatic taxonomy of violent language in online interaction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.23659Keywords:
violent language, online interaction, speech act theory, conventionAbstract
The features of mediated communication, along with those of internet language, enable cyber space to be a home for violent language, the adoption of which generally stems from the sender user’s intense emotions or malicious intentions. In accounting for the diffusion of violent language in online interaction from the perspective of cyberpragmatics and speech act theory, I deduce four major variables of violent language as target, intention, message and effect. Accordingly, the article suggests a pragmatic taxonomy of violent language in online interaction, which consists of six categories ranging from conventional violent language targeted at an individual to unconventional language which is not explicitly targeted. Analysis of the categories testifies that the use of violent language in online interaction is not confined to enemies or adversaries, but extends to people who are close to each other. In such a case, rather than ruin or undermine their relationship, violent language could maintain or even strengthen it. In addition to clarifying how to deal with internet language, the article offers some suggestions for further research.
References
Alava, S., Frau-Meigs, D., & Hassan, G. (2017). Youth and violent extremism on social media: Mapping the research. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Available on https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000260382
Arundale, R. (2006). Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research, 2, 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr.2006.011
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. London: Oxford University Press.
Barlow, J. P. (1996). A declaration of the independence of cyberspace. Electronic Frontier Foundation. www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence
Baron, N. S. (2003). Language of the internet. In A. Farghali (Ed.), The Stanford handbook for language engineers (pp. 59–127). Stanford, CA: CSLI
Chase, S. (1938). The tyranny of words. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
Cherny, L. (1999). Conversation and community: Chat in a virtual world. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, J. (2005). Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture, 1(1), 35–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
Culpeper, J., & Hardaker, C. (2017). Impoliteness. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh and D. Z. Kádár (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness (pp. 199–225). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Derrida, J. (1978). Violence and metaphysics: An essay on the thought of Emmanuel Levinas. In Jacques Derrida (Ed.), Writing and difference (pp. 97–192). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Di Martino, V., Hoel, H., & Cooper, C. L. (2003). Preventing violence and harassment in the workplace. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
Dynel, M. (2011). Entertaining and enraging: The functions of verbal violence in broadcast political debates. In V. Tsakona & D. Popa (Eds.), Studies in political humour (pp. 109–133). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing.
Ferris, P. (1997). What is CMC? An overview of scholarly definitions. https://december.com/cmc/mag/1997/jan/ferris.html
Fracchiolla, B. (2011). Politeness as a strategy of attack in a gendered political debate: The Royal-Sarkozy debate. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(10), 2480–2488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.02.006
Galdeano, A. P. (2017). Voice and silence in the suburbs of São Paulo: State, community and the meanings of violence. In D. N. Silva (Ed.), Language and violence: Pragmatic perspectives (pp. 57–78). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Graddol, D., & Swann, J. (1989). Gender voices. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Graham, S. L., & Hardaker, C. (2017). (Im)politeness in digital communication. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh and D. Z. Kádár (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness (pp. 785–814). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Guay, S., Goncalves, J., & Jarvis, J. (2014). Verbal violence in the workplace according to victims’ sex: A systematic review of the literature, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(5), 572–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.08.001
Halliday, M. (2011). Text, discourse and information: A systematic-functional overview. Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 48(1), 137–146.
Herring, S. C. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 612–634). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Herring, S. C. (2002). Computer-mediated communication on the internet. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 109–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440360104
Horan, G. (2013). “You taught me language; and my profit on’t/Is, I know how to curse”: Cursing and swearing in foreign language learning. Language and Intercultural Communication, 13(3), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2013.804533
Kádár, D. Z., & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39(10), 1123–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.39.10.1123
La Caze, M. (2016). The language of violence: Chiastic encounters. Sophia, 55(1), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-016-0519-z
Langlotz, A., & Locher, M. A. (2013). The role of emotions in relational work. Journal of Pragmatics, 53, 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.014
Lavé, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lea, M., O’Shea, T., Fung, P., & Spears, R. (1992). Flaming in computer mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 89–112). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Locher, M. A., & Graham, S. L. (2010). Introduction to interpersonal pragmatics. In M. A. Locher and S. L. Graham (Eds.), Interpersonal pragmatics (pp. 1–13). Berlin: Mouton.
Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
Mallon, R., & Oppenheim, C. (2002). Style used in electronic mail. Aslib Proceedings, 54(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530210697482
Ruben, G. A. (1998). Violent speech. Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 10(4), 587–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659808426209
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2001). Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. London/New York: Continuum.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Face, (im)politeness and rapport. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory (2nd ed., pp. , 11–47). London: Continuum.
Tagliamonte, S. A., & Denis, D. (2008). Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging and teen language. American Speech, 83(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2008-001
Thurlow, C., Lengel, L., & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer mediated communication social interaction and the internet. London: Sage Publications.
Wilbur, S. P. (1996). An archaeology of cyberspaces: Virtuality, community, identity. In D. Porter (Ed.), Internet culture (pp. 5–22). New York: Routledge.
Wood, A. F., & Smith, J. M. (2005). Online communication: Linking technology, identity, and culture (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Xie, C. (2008). (Im)politeness: Towards an evaluative and embodied approach. Pragmatics & Cognition, 16(1), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1075/p&c.16.1.10xie
Xie, C., & Yus, F. (2018). Introducing internet pragmatics. Internet Pragmatics, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00001.xie
Yu, G. (2001). An introduction to cyber language. Beijing: China Economic Publishing House.
Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Yus, F. (2014). Not all emoticons are created equal. Linguagem em (dis)curso, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4017-140304-0414
Zeng, L., & Li, Y. (2019). The classification and modal sense of implicit violent speech acts. Journal of Nanchang University, 50(5), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.13764/j.cnki.ncds.2019.05.014
