A study of relational ritual, affectivity, and identity (de)construction in Chinese X-change programmes

Authors

  • Chengtuan Li Guangdong University of Foreign Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.19944

Keywords:

relational ritual, affectivity, identity (de)construction, confucian lun

Abstract

This study attempts to examine how, in X-change, a Chinese televised documentary programme, fathers and sons practise their relational rituals, display their emotions and (de)construct their relational identities. Based on data analysis and the Confucian ritual theory five Luns, it finds that in family talk, ritual practices change, switching from negative or deviant ones to positive and normative ones, and the affectivity involved also changes from negative emotion to positive emotion. At the beginning of the programme, due to violation of one of the Confucian Luns – loving father and filial son (fucizixiao) – the father and the son conduct the destructive relational ritual practices, deconstruct their relational identities, and release their negative affect. As the programme progresses, both the father and the son commence to conform to Lun, and hence constructive relational ritual practices occur, and relational identities are reconstructed and normalised in terms of Lun; eventually their affect becomes positive, and their interpersonal rapport is enhanced.

Author Biography

Chengtuan Li, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies

Chengtuan Li is a professor at the Faculty of English Language and Culture and the Centre for Linguistics and Applied Linguistics at Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, P. R. China. His research interests are pragmatics and discourse analysis, with specific reference to identity construction, im/politeness, and rituals. His work has appeared in Journal of Pragmatics, Text & Talk, Intercultural Pragmatics, and some key Chinese journals. His monograph titled An Interpersonal Pragmatic Study of Professional Identity Construction in Chinese Televised Debating Discourse is published by Springer.

References

Artamonova, O. (2018). Teacher’s ethnic teasing: Playing with ambiguity and exploiting in-group communication. Discourse & Society, 29(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517726113

Bax, M. (2000). Ritual discord and the contractual framework: An essay on a paradoxical framing device of the early modern theatre and its foundation in oral tradition and mimetic culture. Semiotica, 132(1/2), 25–74. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2000.132.1-2.25

Bax, M. (2002). Rites of rivalry: Ritual interaction and the emergence of indirect language use. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 3(1), 61–105. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.3.1.04bax

Bax, M. (2003). Ritual modes, ritual minds: Introduction to the special issue on ritual language behaviour. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 4(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.4.2.02bax

Bax, M. (2004). Out of ritual: A semiolinguistic account of the origin and development of indirect language behavior. In M. Bax, H. Barend, & W. Wolfgang (Eds.), Semiotic evolution and the dynamics of culture (pp. 155–213). Bern: Peter Lang.

Bax, M. (2009). Generic evolution: Ritual, rhetoric, and the rise of discursive rationality. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(4), 780–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.048

Bell, C. (1992). Ritual theory, ritual practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bell, C. (1997). Ritual: Perspectives and dimensions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chen, R., & Chen, X. (2020). Introduction. East Asian Pragmatics, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.40374

Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851744

Cook, G., & Walter, T. (2005). Rewritten rites: Language and social relations in traditional and contemporary funerals. Discourse & Society, 16(3), 365–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926505051171

Culpeper, J. (2001). Language and characterisation: People in plays and other texts. London: Longman.

Culpeper, J. (2010). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752

Du Bois, J. W. (1986). Self evidence and ritual speech. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Esposito, E. (2017). The mother’s picong: A discursive approach to gender, identity and political leadership in Trinidad and Tobago. Discourse & Society, 28(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516676692

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behaviour. New York: Anchor Books.

Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Basic Books.

Handelman, D. (1996). Traps of transformation: Theoretical convergences. In G. Hasan-Rokem & D. Shulman (Eds.), Untying the knot: On riddles and other enigmatic modes. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ide, R. (1998). ‘Sorry for your kindness’: Japanese interactional ritual in public discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(5), 509–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)80006-4

Jin, T. (2012). Si shu wu jing (The four books). Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.

Kádár, D. (2012). Relational ritual. In J. Verschueren & O. Jan-Ola (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 1–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.16.rel2

Kádár, D. (2013). Relational rituals and communication: Ritual interaction in groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230393059

Kádár, D., & Bax, M. (2013). In-group ritual and relational work. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.011

Kádár, D., & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717

Kádár, D., & Ran, Y. (2015). Ritual in intercultural contact: A metapragmatic case study of heckling. Journal of Pragmatics, 77, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.12.011

Kelly-Holmes, H. (1998). The discourse of western marketing professionals in central and eastern Europe: Their role in the creation of a context for marketing and advertising messages. Discourse & Society, 9(3), 339–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009003003

Langlotz, A., & Locher, M. (2013). The role of emotions in relational work. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.014

Li, C., & Ran, Y. (2016). Self-professional identity construction through other-identity deconstruction in Chinese televised debating discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 94, 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.01.001

Liu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2010). Jiyu yuliaoku de zhongxue yingyu ketang guiyue huayu yanjiu (A corpus-based study on ritual discourse in Chinese middle school English classroom). Foreign Language and Foreign Language Teaching, 4, 14–18.

Locher, M. (2008). Relational work, politeness, and identity construction. In G. Antos & E. Ventola (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 509–540). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211399.4.509

Locher, M. (2013). Relational work and interpersonal pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.014

Lüger, H. (1983). Some aspects of ritual communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 7(6), 695–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(83)90091-7

Montgomery, M. (2010). Rituals of personal experience in television news interviews. Discourse & Communication, 4(2), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481310364322

Muir, E. (2005). Ritual in early modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rossner, M. (2011). Emotions and interaction ritual: A micro analysis of restorative justice. The British Journal of Criminology, 51(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq075

Rizza, C. (2015). Death row statements: A discourse of play. Discourse & Society, 26(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514543228

Xu, L. (1996). Kuawenhua jiaoji zhong de yantan guiyue wenti (A study of norms in cross-cultural communication). Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 1, 24–30.

Zhang, Y. (2006). Lunyu (The analects of Confucius). Beijing: Zhong Hua Press.

Published

2022-06-16

How to Cite

Li, C. (2022). A study of relational ritual, affectivity, and identity (de)construction in Chinese X-change programmes. East Asian Pragmatics, 7(2), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.19944

Issue

Section

Articles