A study of relational ritual, affectivity, and identity (de)construction in Chinese X-change programmes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.19944Keywords:
relational ritual, affectivity, identity (de)construction, confucian lunAbstract
This study attempts to examine how, in X-change, a Chinese televised documentary programme, fathers and sons practise their relational rituals, display their emotions and (de)construct their relational identities. Based on data analysis and the Confucian ritual theory five Luns, it finds that in family talk, ritual practices change, switching from negative or deviant ones to positive and normative ones, and the affectivity involved also changes from negative emotion to positive emotion. At the beginning of the programme, due to violation of one of the Confucian Luns – loving father and filial son (fucizixiao) – the father and the son conduct the destructive relational ritual practices, deconstruct their relational identities, and release their negative affect. As the programme progresses, both the father and the son commence to conform to Lun, and hence constructive relational ritual practices occur, and relational identities are reconstructed and normalised in terms of Lun; eventually their affect becomes positive, and their interpersonal rapport is enhanced.
References
Artamonova, O. (2018). Teacher’s ethnic teasing: Playing with ambiguity and exploiting in-group communication. Discourse & Society, 29(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517726113
Bax, M. (2000). Ritual discord and the contractual framework: An essay on a paradoxical framing device of the early modern theatre and its foundation in oral tradition and mimetic culture. Semiotica, 132(1/2), 25–74. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2000.132.1-2.25
Bax, M. (2002). Rites of rivalry: Ritual interaction and the emergence of indirect language use. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 3(1), 61–105. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.3.1.04bax
Bax, M. (2003). Ritual modes, ritual minds: Introduction to the special issue on ritual language behaviour. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 4(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.4.2.02bax
Bax, M. (2004). Out of ritual: A semiolinguistic account of the origin and development of indirect language behavior. In M. Bax, H. Barend, & W. Wolfgang (Eds.), Semiotic evolution and the dynamics of culture (pp. 155–213). Bern: Peter Lang.
Bax, M. (2009). Generic evolution: Ritual, rhetoric, and the rise of discursive rationality. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(4), 780–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.048
Bell, C. (1992). Ritual theory, ritual practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bell, C. (1997). Ritual: Perspectives and dimensions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chen, R., & Chen, X. (2020). Introduction. East Asian Pragmatics, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.40374
Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851744
Cook, G., & Walter, T. (2005). Rewritten rites: Language and social relations in traditional and contemporary funerals. Discourse & Society, 16(3), 365–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926505051171
Culpeper, J. (2001). Language and characterisation: People in plays and other texts. London: Longman.
Culpeper, J. (2010). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752
Du Bois, J. W. (1986). Self evidence and ritual speech. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Esposito, E. (2017). The mother’s picong: A discursive approach to gender, identity and political leadership in Trinidad and Tobago. Discourse & Society, 28(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516676692
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behaviour. New York: Anchor Books.
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Basic Books.
Handelman, D. (1996). Traps of transformation: Theoretical convergences. In G. Hasan-Rokem & D. Shulman (Eds.), Untying the knot: On riddles and other enigmatic modes. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ide, R. (1998). ‘Sorry for your kindness’: Japanese interactional ritual in public discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(5), 509–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)80006-4
Jin, T. (2012). Si shu wu jing (The four books). Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.
Kádár, D. (2012). Relational ritual. In J. Verschueren & O. Jan-Ola (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 1–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.16.rel2
Kádár, D. (2013). Relational rituals and communication: Ritual interaction in groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230393059
Kádár, D., & Bax, M. (2013). In-group ritual and relational work. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.011
Kádár, D., & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717
Kádár, D., & Ran, Y. (2015). Ritual in intercultural contact: A metapragmatic case study of heckling. Journal of Pragmatics, 77, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.12.011
Kelly-Holmes, H. (1998). The discourse of western marketing professionals in central and eastern Europe: Their role in the creation of a context for marketing and advertising messages. Discourse & Society, 9(3), 339–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009003003
Langlotz, A., & Locher, M. (2013). The role of emotions in relational work. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.014
Li, C., & Ran, Y. (2016). Self-professional identity construction through other-identity deconstruction in Chinese televised debating discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 94, 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.01.001
Liu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2010). Jiyu yuliaoku de zhongxue yingyu ketang guiyue huayu yanjiu (A corpus-based study on ritual discourse in Chinese middle school English classroom). Foreign Language and Foreign Language Teaching, 4, 14–18.
Locher, M. (2008). Relational work, politeness, and identity construction. In G. Antos & E. Ventola (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 509–540). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211399.4.509
Locher, M. (2013). Relational work and interpersonal pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.014
Lüger, H. (1983). Some aspects of ritual communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 7(6), 695–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(83)90091-7
Montgomery, M. (2010). Rituals of personal experience in television news interviews. Discourse & Communication, 4(2), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481310364322
Muir, E. (2005). Ritual in early modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rossner, M. (2011). Emotions and interaction ritual: A micro analysis of restorative justice. The British Journal of Criminology, 51(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq075
Rizza, C. (2015). Death row statements: A discourse of play. Discourse & Society, 26(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514543228
Xu, L. (1996). Kuawenhua jiaoji zhong de yantan guiyue wenti (A study of norms in cross-cultural communication). Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 1, 24–30.
Zhang, Y. (2006). Lunyu (The analects of Confucius). Beijing: Zhong Hua Press.