Teasing as a practice of managing delicate issues in institutional talk
A case study of request in Mandarin Chinese
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.39613Keywords:
teasing, deviance, identity construction, affiliationAbstract
This article takes the practice of teasing in institutional talk as its focus and examines a Mandarin Chinese case of request from a conversation analytic perspective. It turns out that teasing can effectively perform the tasks of social control and tension management in institutional interactions. With detailed analyses of the mechanisms that can be employed to resolve delicate issues in institutional contexts, it is proposed that teasing as a social action can enable conversational participants to express and tackle the underlying conflicts or problems in institutional encounters. The present research also probes into the tacit manoeuvring of the teaser and the tease recipient’s identities or category memberships achieved or built up by minor transgressions, deviant claims, deontic assertions, and (dis)affiliation displays. This study contributes to the understanding of dynamic identity construction in social encounters and overall tension management in institutional contexts as well.
References
Antaki, C., & Kent, A. (2012). Telling people what to do (and, sometimes, why): Contingency, entitlement and explanation in staff requests to adults with intellectual impairments. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(6–7), 876–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.014
Boxer, D., & Cortés-Conde, F. B. (1997). From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal of Pragmatics, 27(3), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00031-8
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness (pp. 56–289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals of language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, R., & Keegan, D. (1999). Humor in the hotel kitchen. Humor, 12(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1999.12.1.47
Chao, Yuenren (2011). Hanyu kouyu yufa (A grammar of spoken Chinese). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
Clift, R. (2016). Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Craven, A., & Potter, J. (2010) Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies, 12(4), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445610370126
Drew, P. (1987). Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics, 25(1), 219–253. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.219
Drew, P. (1997). ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28(1), 69–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)89759-7
Drew, P. (2013). Turn design. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 131–149). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch7
Drew, P. (2018). Epistemics in social interaction. Discourse Studies, 20(1), 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617734347
Drew, P., & Walker, T. (2009). Going too far: Complaining, escalating and disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(12), 2400–2414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.046
Eder, D. (1991). The role of teasing in adolescent peer group culture. In P. Adler, P. A. Adler, S. Cahill, & N. Mandell (Eds.), Sociological studies of child development: Perspectives on and of children (vol. 4, pp. 181–197). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Eisenberg, A. R. (1986). Teasing: Verbal play in two Mexicano homes. In B. Schieffelin & E. Ochs (Eds.), Language socialization across cultures (pp. 182–198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511620898.009
Fitzgerald, R., & Housley, W. (Eds.) (2015). Advances in membership categorisation analysis. London: SAGE.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University.
Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haugh, M. (2010). Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation and face. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2106–2119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018
Haugh, M. (2014). Jocular mockery as interactional practice in everyday Anglo-Australian conversation. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 34(1), 76–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2014.875456
Haugh, M. (2015). Im/politeness implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Haugh, M. (2017). Teasing. In A. Salvatore (Ed.), Handbook of language and humour (pp. 204–218). London: Routledge.
Haugh, M., & Bousfield, D. (2012). Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery and jocular abuse in Australian and British English. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(9), 1099-1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.02.003
Haugh, M., & Pillet-Shore, D. (2018). Getting to know you: Teasing as an invitation to intimacy in initial interactions. Discourse Studies, 20(2), 246–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617734936
Haugh, M., & Weinglass, L. (2018). Divided by a common language? Jocular quips and (non-)affiliative responses in initial interactions among American and Australian speakers of English. Intercultural Pragmatics, 15(4), 533–562. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2018-0019
Hay, J. (1994). Jocular abuse patterns in mixed-group interaction. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics, 6, 26–55.
Heinemann, T. (2006). “Will you or can’t you?”: Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(7), 1081–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.013
Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2011). Threats: Power, family mealtimes, and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X500791
Heritage, J. (2013). Epistemics in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 370–394). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch18
Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. (2010). Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
Kowalski, R. M. (2000). “I was only kidding!”: Victims’ and perpetrators’ perceptions of teasing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200264009
Kruger, J., Gordon, C. L., & Kuban, J. (2006). Intentions in teasing: When “just kidding” just isn’t good enough. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 412–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.412
Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. (2012). Action formation and ascription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210–228). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch6
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lindström, A., & Sorjonen, M. L. (2012). Affiliation in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 363–382). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch17
Lytra, V. (2007). Teasing in contact encounters: Frames, participant positions and responses. Multilingua, 26(4), 381–408. https://doi.org/10.1515/MULTI.2007.018
Lytra, V. (2009). Constructing academic hierarchies: Teasing and identity work among peers at school. Pragmatics 19(3), 449–66. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19.3.09lyt
Meyer, J. C. (2000). Humor as a double-edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication. Communication Theory, 10(3), 310–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00194.x
Miller, P. (1986). Teasing as language socialization and verbal play in a white working-class community. In B. Schieffelin, & E. Ochs (Eds.), Language socialization across cultures (pp. 199–212). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511620898.010
Mitchell, N. (2015). Goading as a social action: Non-impolite evaluations in targeted banter. In M. Terkourafi (Ed.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on im/politeness (pp. 121–148). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.14.07mit
Moody, S. J. (2019). Contextualizing macro-level identities and constructing inclusiveness through teasing and self-mockery: A view from the intercultural workplace in Japan. Journal of Pragmatics, 152, 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.023
Mortensen, M., & Baarts, C. (2018), Killing ourselves with laughter … Mapping the interplay of organizational teasing and workplace bullying in hospital work life. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 13(1), 10-31. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-10-2016-1429
Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128
Raymond, J., & Heritage, J. (2006). The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society, 35(5), 677–705. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325
Réger, Z. (1999). Teasing in the linguistic socialization of Gypsy children in Hungary. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 46(3–4), 289–315. https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009610125119
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075–95. (Reprinted in J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 346–380). New York: Rinehart & Winston.)
Schegloff, E. A. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 9, 111–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148124
Schegloff, E. A. (2007a). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 462–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007
Schegloff, E. A. (2007b). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
Schnurr, S. (2009). Constructing leader identities through teasing at work. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(6), 1125–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.002
Schnurr, S., & Plester, B. (2017). Functionalist discourse analysis of humor. In A. Salvatore (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor (pp. 309–321). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-22
Stevanovic, M. (2011). Participants’ deontic rights and action formation: The case of declarative. Interaction and Linguistic Structures (InLiSt), 52, 1–37. http://www.inlist.uni-bayreuth.de/issues/52/Inlist52.pdf
Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A. (2012). Deontic authority in interaction: The right to announce, propose, and decide. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(3), 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.699260
Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A. (2014). Three orders in the organization of human action: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations. Language in Society, 43(2), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404514000037
Stevanovic, M., & Svennevig, J. (2015). Epistemics and deontics in conversational directives. Journal of Pragmatics, 78, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.008
Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2006). Request sequences: The intersection of grammar, interaction and social context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Tholander, M., & Aronsson, K. (2002). Teasing as serious business: Collaborative staging and response work. Text & Talk, 22(4), 559–595. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.022
Wright, C. N., & Roloff, M. E. (2013). The influence of type of teasing and outcome on the negative experience of teasers. Human Communication, 16(2), 95–107.
Yu, Guodong., & Drew, P. (2017). The role of búshì in talk about everyday troubles and difficulties. East Asian Pragmatics 2(2), 195–227. https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.34673
Yu, Guodong., Wu, Yaxin, & Drew, P. (2019). Couples bickering: Disaffiliation and discord in Chinese conversation. Discourse Studies, 21(4), 458–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445619842739
Zhang Bin (2001). Xiandai hanyu xuci cidian (A dictionary of modern Chinese function words). Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
