Conditionals and clause order
A new look from the postposed -myen clauses in Korean
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.18263Keywords:
conditionals, clause order, -myen clauses, discourseAbstract
This article aims to shed new light on our understanding of the role of clause-order choice in conditionals by presenting an account of the construction of postposed -myen sentences in Korean. The article argues, unlike Lee (1996), that speakers of Korean have a choice of clause order in conditionals in spoken discourse, and they are motivated to postpose the -myen clauses for diverse discourse-functional reasons, such as to make the discourse structure and flow smooth, interactive, and coherent to the hearer. This study strongly implies that conditionals should be understood in the context of a dynamic interaction between the speaker and the hearer in the flow of discourse as their syntactic form interacts with diverse dynamic discourse factors.
References
Akatsuka, N. (1986). Conditionals are discourse-bound. In E. C. Traugott, A. T. Meulen, J. S. Reilly, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), On conditionals (pp. 333–351). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753466.018
Athanasiadou, A., & Dirven, R. (Eds.). (1997). On conditionals again. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.143
Birner, B. J., & Ward, G. (1996). A crosslinguistic study of postposing in discourse. Language and Speech, 39(2–3), 113–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099603900302
Chafe, W. (1996). The analysis of discourse flow. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 673–687). Oxford: Blackwell.
Ford, C. E. (1997). Speaking conditionally: Some contexts for if-clauses in conversation. In A. Athanasiadou & R. Dirven (Eds.), On conditionals again (pp. 387–413). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.143.21for
Ford, C. E., & Thompson, S. A. (1986). Conditionals in discourse: A text-based study from English. In E. C. Traugott, A. T. Meulen, J. S. Reilly, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), On conditionals (pp. 353–371). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753466.019
Kim, T. H. (2011). An empirical study of postposing constructions in Korean. Linguistic Research, 28(1), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.28.1.201104.012
Koo, H. J. (2001). On discourse functions of conditionals. Hanmal YenKu (Korean Language Research Association), 9, 27–52.
Koo, H. J. (2002). Turn taking system of conditionals in discourse. The Journal of Linguistic Science, 21, 1–24.
Lee, C. B. (1996). Conditionals as a discourse-bound entity: Pragmatics of Korean conditionals (PhD dissertation). University of Pennsylvania.
Prince, E. F. (1992). The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information status. In W. C. Mann & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analysis of a fund-raising text (pp. 295–325). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.16.12pri
Reilly, J. (1986). The acquisition of temporals and conditionals. In E. C. Traugott, A. T. Meulen, J. S. Reilly, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), On conditionals (pp. 309–332). New York: Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753466.017
Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904
Traugott, E. C., Meulen, A. T., Reilly, J. S., & Ferguson, C. A. (Eds.). (1986). On conditionals. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753466
