Motives of attentiveness and their interactional manifestations

Authors

  • Saeko Fukushima Tsuru University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.40998

Keywords:

interpersonal pragmatics, attentiveness, empathy, reciprocity

Abstract

The present study approaches attentiveness (demonstrated by a pre-emptive response in the form of an offer) in a context wherein interpersonal relations have attracted increasing attention in recent (im)politeness research. It aims to delve into what motivates the demonstration of attentiveness and how it impacts the unfolding of interaction. Insights from multiple disciplines such as social psychology, anthropology, and cultural semantics are drawn in the course of the present investigation. It is proposed that attentiveness is motivated by empathy and/or reciprocity, which can partly explain how interaction occurs and unfolds. It is also shown that attentiveness motivated by empathy and that by reciprocity are interrelated.

Author Biography

Saeko Fukushima, Tsuru University

Saeko Fukushima is Professor in the Department of English at Tsuru University in Japan. She has published Requests and Culture: Politeness in British English and Japanese (Peter Lang 2000/2002/2003) and articles in edited volumes and international journals such as Journal of Politeness Research, Journal of Pragmatics, Language Sciences, Multilingua, Pragmatics and World Englishes. Her research interests include cross-cultural pragmatics, intercultural pragmatics, sociopragmatics, pragmalinguistics, politeness, and metapragmatics.

References

Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2013). (8th ed.). Social Psychology. Boston: Person Education, Inc.

Burdelski, M. (2010). Socializing politeness routines: Action, other-orientation, and embodiment in a Japanese preschool. Journal of Pragmatics 42(6), 1606–1621. http:// doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.007

Burdelski, M. (2013). ‘I’m sorry, flower’: Socializing apology, relationships, and empathy in Japan. Pragmatics and Society 4(1), 54–81. http://doi.org/10.1075/ps.4.1.03bur

Burger, J. M., Sanchez, J., Imberi, J. E., & Grande, L. R. (2009). The norm of reciprocity as an internalized social norm: Returning favors even when no one finds out. Social Influence 4(1), 11–17. http://doi.org/10.1080/15534510802131004

Caffi, C. (1998). Metapragmatics. In J. Mey (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of pragmatics (pp. 581–586). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Capone, A., & Mey, J. L. (Eds.). (2016). Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6

Chang, W-L. M., & Fukushima, S. (2017). ‘Your care and concern are my burden!’: Accounting for the emic concepts of ‘attentiveness’ and ‘empathy’ in interpersonal relationships among Taiwanese females. East Asian Pragmatics 2(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.33081

Clancy, P. (1986). The acquisition of communicative style in Japanese. In B. Schieffelin & E. Ochs (Eds.), Language socialization across cultures (pp. 213–250). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clancy, P. (1990). Acquiring communicative style in Japanese. In R. C. Scarcella, E. S. Andersen, & S. D. Krashen (Eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language (pp. 27–35). New York: Newbury House Publishers.

Cook, H. M. (2008). Language socialization in Japanese. In P. A. Duff, & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, Volume 8: Language socialization (pp. 87-99). New York: Springer.

Cook, H. M., & Burdelski, M. (2017). (Im)politeness: Language and socialization. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, & D. Z. Kádár (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness (pp. 461–488). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_18

Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Culpeper, J. (2019). (Im)politeness and reciprocity. A keynote lecture delivered at the 16th International Pragmatics Conference. Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 9–14 July 2019.

Culpeper, J., & Haugh, M. (2014). Pragmatics and the English language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Dunn, C. D. (2013). Speaking politely, kindly and beautifully: Ideologies of politeness training in Japanese business etiquette training. Multilingua 32(2), 225–245. http://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2013-0011

Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.

Fukushima, S. (2000). Requests and culture: Politeness in British English and Japanese. Bern: Peter Lang.

Fukushima, S. (2004). Evaluation of politeness: The case of attentiveness. Multilingua, 23(4), 365–387. http://doi.org/10.1515/multi.2004.23.4.365

Fukushima, S. (2009). Evaluation of politeness: Do the Japanese evaluate attentiveness more positively than the British? Pragmatics 19(4), 501­–518. http://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19.4.01fuk

Fukushima, S. (2011). A cross-generational and cross-cultural study on demonstration of attentiveness. Pragmatics 21, 549–571. http://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21.4.03fuk

Fukushima, S. (2013). Evaluation of (im)politeness: A comparative study among Japanese students, Japanese parents and American students on evaluation of attentiveness. Pragmatics, 23(2), 275–299. http://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23.2.04fuk

Fukushima, S. (2015). In search of another understanding of politeness: From the perspective of attentiveness. Journal of Politeness Research 11(2), 261–287. http://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0011

Fukushima, S. (2016). Emic understandings of attentiveness and its related concepts among Japanese. East Asian Pragmatics 1(2), 181–208. http://doi.org/10.1558/eap.vli2.31762

Fukushima, S. (2019). A metapragmatic aspect of politeness: With a special emphasis on attentiveness in Japanese. In E. Ogiermann & P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (Eds.), From speech acts to lay concepts of politeness: A multilingual and multicultural perspective (pp. 226–247). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182119.010

Fukushima, S. (2020). Metapragmatics of attentiveness: A study in interpersonal and cross-cultural pragmatics. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.

Fukushima, S., & Haugh, M. (2014). The role of emic understandings in theorizing im/ politeness: The metapragmatics of attentiveness, empathy and anticipatory inference in Japanese and Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 74, 165–179. http://doi.org/10.1016/j. pragma.2014.08.004

Fukushima, S., & Sifianou, M. (2017). Conceptualizing politeness in Japanese and Greek. Intercultural Pragmatics 14(4), 525–555. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0024.

Gladkova, A. (2010). Sympathy, compassion, and empathy in English and Russian: A linguistic and cultural analysis. Culture & Psychology 16(2), 267–285. http://doi.org/10.1177/1354067x10361396

Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review 25, 161–178. http://doi.org/10.2307/2092623

Grainger, K. (2014). Rethinking conventional indirectness: The view from interactional sociolinguistics. Paper presented at the 8th International Symposium on Politeness, University of Huddersfield, 9-11 July 2014.

Greenberg, M. (1980). A theory of indebtedness. In G. Kenneth, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 3–26). New York: Plenum Press.

Gu, Y. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2): 237-257.

Haugh, M. (2016). The role of English as a scientific metalanguage for research in pragmatics: Reflections on the metapragmatics of ‘politeness’ in Japanese. East Asian Pragmatics 1(1), 39-71. http://doi.org/10.1558/eap.vlil.27610

Haugh, M. (2018). Afterword: Theorizing (im)politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 14(1), 153–165. http://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0058

Haugh, M., Kádár, D. Z., & Mills, S. (2013). Interpersonal pragmatics: Issues and debates. Journal of Pragmatics 58, 1–11. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.009

Haugh, M., & Chang, W.-L. M. (2015). Troubles talk, (dis)affiliation and the participation order in Taiwanese-Chinese online discussion boards. In M. Dynel, & J. Chovanec (Eds.), Participation in public and social media interactions (pp. 99–133). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hübler, A. (2011). Metapragmatics. In W. Bublitz, & N. R. Norrick (Eds.), Foundations of pragmatics (pp. 107–136). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Ide, S., Hill, B., Carnes, Y., Ogino, T., & Kawasaki, A. (1992). The concept of politeness: An empirical study of American English and Japanese. In R. Watts, S. Ide, & K. Ehlich (Eds.), Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice (pp. 281–297). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. http://doi.org/10.1515/9783110886542-014

Kádár, D. Z. (2017). Politeness, impoliteness and ritual: Maintaining the moral order in interpersonal interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kádár, D. Z., & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717

Kádár, D. Z., & Mills, S. (2011). Introduction. In D. Z. Kádár & S. Mills, (Eds.), Politeness in East Asia (pp. 1­–17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kitahara, Y. (Ed.). (2002). Meikyou kokugo jiten. Tokyo: Taishuukan shoten.

Kupetz, M. (2014). Empathy displays as interactional achievements: Multimodal and sequential aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 61, 4–34. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.006

Lebra, T. S. (1976). Japanese patterns of behavior. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

Lebra, T. S. (1993). Culture, self, and communication in Japan and the United States. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication in Japan and the United States (pp. 51–87). Albany: State University of New York Press.

Lebra, T. S. (2004). The Japanese self in cultural logic. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

Leech, G. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Levinson, S. C. (2018). Spatial cognition, empathy and language evolution. Studies in Pragmatics 20, 16–21.

Locher, M. A. (2012). Politeness research from past to future, with a special focus on the discursive approach. In L. F. Amaya, M. de la O. H. López, R. G. Morón, M. P. Cruz, M. M. Borrero, & M. R. Barranca (Eds.), New perspectives on (im)politeness and interpersonal communication (pp. 36–60). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Locher, M. A. (2015). Interpersonal pragmatics and its link to (im)politeness research. Journal of Pragmatics 86, 5–10. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.01

Locher, M. A., & Graham, S. L. (2010). Introduction to interpersonal pragmatics. In M. A. Locher & S. L. Graham (Eds.), Interpersonal pragmatics (pp. 1–13). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. http://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214338.01

Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1), 9–33. http://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9

Miyazaki, H. (1988). Tonari no Totoro [My Neighbour Totoro]. Tokyo: Studio Ghibli.

Ogiermann, E. (2015). Direct off-record requests? — ‘Hinting’ in family interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 86, 31–35. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.006

Ohashi, J. (2008). Linguistic ritual for thanking in Japanese: Balancing obligations. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 2150–2174. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.001

Ohashi, J. (2013). Thanking and politeness in Japanese: Balancing acts in interaction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Ohashi, J., & Chang, W.-L. M. (2017). (Im)politeness and relationality. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, & D. Z. Kádár (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness (pp. 257–285). http://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_11

Pizziconi, B. (2007). The lexical mapping of politeness in British English and Japanese. Journal of Politeness Research, 3(2), 207–241. https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2007.010

Pudlinski, C. (2005). Doing empathy and sympathy: Caring responses to troubles tellings on a peer support line. Discourse Studies 7, 267–288. http://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605052177

Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., Ramos, A., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Demiruku, K., Dirilen-gumus, O., & Kotty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103(4), 663–688.

Shinmura, I. (Ed.) (2018). (7th ed.). Kojien. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.

Sifianou, M. (1993). Off-record indirectness and the notion of imposition. Multilingua, 12(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1993.12.1.69

Sifianou, M. (1997). Politeness and off-record indirectness. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 126(1), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1997.126.163

Sifianou, M. (2019). Im/politeness and in/civility: A neglected relationship? Journal of Pragmatics 147, 49–64. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.008

Sifianou, M., & Tzanne, A. (2010). Conceptualizations of politeness and impoliteness in Greek. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(4), 661–687. https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2020.029

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. London: Continuum.

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2005). (Im)politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1), 95–119. http://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95

Spencer-Oatey, H., & Xing, J. (2019). Interdisciplinary perspective on interpersonal relations and the evaluation process: Culture, norms, and the moral order. Journal of Pragmatics, 151, 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.015

Spencer-Oatey, H., & Žegarac, V. (2018). Conceptualizing culture and its impact on behavior. In C. Frisby & W. O’Donohue (Eds.), Cultural competence in applied psychology: An evaluation of current status and future directions (pp. 211–241). New York: Springer.

Tantucci, V., Culpeper, J., & Cristofaro, M. D. (2017). Dynamic resonance and social reciprocity in language change: the case of Good morrow. Language Sciences 68, 1–16. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.09.004

Travis, C. (1998). Omoiyari as a core Japanese value: Japanese-style empathy? In A. Athansiadou & E. Tabakowska (Eds.), Speaking of emotions: Conceptualisation and expression (pp. 55–81). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. http://doi.org/10.1515/9783110806007.55

Uchida, Y. (2011). Sympathy in Japanese cultural context: A cross-cultural perspective. Kagaku, 81(1), 51-53.

Uchida, Y., & Kitayama, S. (2001). Omoiyari shakudo no sakusei to datousei no kentou [Development and validation of a sympathy scale]. Shinrigaku Kenkyuu [The Japanese Journal of Psychology], 72(4), 275–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.72.275

Verschueren, J. (2000). Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. Pragmatics, 10(4), 439–456.

Watts, R. J. (1989). Relevance and relational work: linguistic politeness as politic behaviour. Multilingua 8, 131–166.

Watts, R. J. (1992). Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: reconsidering claims for universality. In R. J. Watts, S. Ide, & K. Ehlich (Eds.), Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice (pp. 43–69). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184

Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding cultures through their key words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wynn, R., & Wynn, M. (2006). Empathy as an interactionally achieved phenomenon in psychotherapy: Characteristics of some conversational resources. Journal of Pagmatics 38(9), 1385–1397. http://doi.org/10.1016/j/pragma.2005.09.008

Zhao, L., & Ran, Y. (2019). Impoliteness revisited: Evidence from qingmian threats in Chinese interpersonal conflicts. Journal of Politeness Research 15(2), 257-291. http://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0027

Published

2020-07-24

How to Cite

Fukushima, S. (2020). Motives of attentiveness and their interactional manifestations. East Asian Pragmatics, 5(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.40998

Issue

Section

Articles