“Guess who I am”
Constructing false identities for fraudulent purposes in the Chinese context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.39366Keywords:
fraudulence, pragmatic identity, discursive practices, Chinese contextAbstract
Pragmaticists have investigated identity construction in various social practices. Yet, seldom have they paid attention to false identities assumed in interactions like fraudulence. This study, by resorting to Chen’s (2018) theory on pragmatic identity, investigates 72 real fraud cases in contemporary China, trying to uncover the discursive practices for their fabricated identities and the underlying motivations for these identities. It is found that (i) fabricated identities like the victim identity, the friend/kin identity, the clerk identity, the official identity, and the identity of resourcefulness are often deployed as resources for fraudulent purposes; (ii) speech acts, person-referencing, discourse contents, codes, and sounds of speech are the common discursive practices con artists resort to in fabricating their identities; and (iii) the construction of the fabricated identities results from the con artists’ adaptation to the physical, social, and mental world of their targets. The study broadens the scope of identity construction by focusing on that of fabricated identity.
References
Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identities in talk. London: Sage.
Blommaert, J., & Omoniyi, T. (2006). Email fraud: Language, technology and the indexicals of globalisation. Social Semiotics, 16(4), 573–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330601019942
Brewer, M., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this ‘We’? Levels of collective identity and selfrepresentations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chen, X. R. (2018). Yuyong shenfen lun: Ruhe yong shenfen huayu zuo shi [Pragmatic identity: How to do things with words of identity]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University.
Chiles, T. (2007). The construction of an identity as ‘mentor’ in white collar and academic workplaces: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(4), 730–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.015
Chiluwa, I. (2009). The discourse of digital deceptions and ‘419’ e-mails. Discourse Studies, 11(6), 635–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609347229
Chiluwa, I. (2010). The pragmatics of hoax e-mail business proposals. Linguistik Online, 43, 3.
Dilmon, R. (2009). Between thinking and speaking: Linguistic tools for detecting a fabrication. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(6), 1152–1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.032
Dulaney, E. F. (1982). Changes in language behavior as a function of veracity. Human Communication Research, 9(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1982.tb00684.x
Eggington, W. G. (2008). Deception and fraud. In J. Gibbons & M. T. Turell (Eds.), Dimensions of forensic linguistics (pp. 249–264). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.5.17egg
Freiermuth, M. (2011). Text, lies and electronic bait: An analysis of email fraud and the decisions of the unsuspecting. Discourse & Communication, 5(2), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481310395448
Galasinski, D. (2000). The language of deception: A discourse analytical study. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ho, V. (2010). Constructing identities through request e-mail discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2253–2261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.02.002
Holmes, J. (2006). Workplace narratives, professional identity and relational practice. In A. De Fina, D. Schiffrin, & M. Bamberg (Eds.), Discourse and identity (pp. 166–187). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511584459.009
Knapp, M., Hart, R., & Dennis, H. (1974). An exploration of deception as a communication construct. Human Communication Research, 1, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1974.tb00250.x
Kong, K. (2003). “Are you my friend?”: Negotiating friendship in conversations between network marketers and their prospects. Language in Society, 32(4), 487–522. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404503324029
Palena, N., Caso, L., & Vrij, A. (2019). Detecting lies via a theme-selection strategy. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02775
Ren, Y. X. (2014). Constructing identities in academic advising interaction. Tianjin: Nankai University Press.
Shuy, R. (2016). The language of fraud. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2007). Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(4), 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004
Steller, M., & Koehnken, G. (1989). Criteria-based statement analysis. In D. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation (pp. 217–245). New York: Springer.
Tracy, K. (2002). Everyday talk: Building and reflecting identities. New York: The Guilford Press.
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. London: Arnold.
Yuan, Z. M. (2018). Exploring Chinese college students’ construction of online identity on the Sina Microblog. Discourse, Context & Media, 26(6), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.02.001
Yuan, Z. M., & Chen, X. R. (2013). Yuyan shunyinglun shijiao xia de yuyong shenfen jiangou yanjiu [A study of pragmatic identity construction from the perspective of linguistic adaptation theory: A case study of medical consultations]. Waiyu jiaoxue yu yanjiu [Foreign Language Teaching and Research], 45(4), 518–530.
