Integrity of Qur'anic Legislations

A Critical Review of the Debate on Abrogation

Authors

  • Ahmed Ali Salem Zayed University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/cis.23749

Keywords:

The Quran, The Sunna, Islamic Legislation, Abrogation

Abstract

Abrogation is claimed to be required to resolve alleged contradictions between legislations in the Qu'ran, the Prophet’s Sunna, or both. The opponents of abrogation find the alleged contradictions imaginary because the Qu'ran is coherent and the legislative Sunna is its perfect implementation that God endorsed. Accordingly, the Qur'anic legislations are fully consistent if their different conditions and ultimate goals are considered. Different legislative verses were revealed in different circumstances to be applicable later in similar circumstances. Applying the Qur'anic legislations and the Prophet’s Sunna carefully in appropriate contexts can prove the integrity, consistency, universality, and eternity of the Qur'anic legislations. This article critically reviews the debate on the abrogation claim in Arabic literature, both classical and modern—debate that has important theological, legal and practical implications.

Author Biography

  • Ahmed Ali Salem, Zayed University

    Ahmed Ali Salem is professor and associate dean in the College of Humanities and Social Sciences at Zayed University, United Arab Emirates, and senior research associate in the Department of Political and International Studies at Rhodes University, South Africa. His research interests include mainstream, critical and non-Western theories of international relations; foreign policies of Muslim and Western states towards each other; and Muslim reformist thoughts. He is the author of, among other works, “Resisting Islamophobia: Efforts of International Organizations, Civil Institutions, and Global Movements,” My Ummah and the World, Vol. 15 (Cairo: Civilization Center for Studies and Researches, 2020).

References

Aal-Mansoor, Salih bin Abd al-Aziz. 1980. Usool al-Fiqh wa Ibn Taymiyah [Fundamentals of Jurisprudence and Ibn Taymiyah]. n.p.

Abu-Zahra, Muhammad. n.d. Usool al-Fiqh [Fundamentals of Jurisprudence]. Cairo: Dar Al-Fikr Al-'Arabi.

Al-'Alwani, Taha J. 2014. Ishkaliyyat at-ta'amul ma'a al-Sunna an-nabawiyyah [Problems of Dealing with the Prophet’s Sunna]. Herndon, VA: The International Institute of Islamic Thought.

———. 2007. Nahwa Mawqif Qur'ani min an-Naskh [Towards a Qur'anic Position Regarding Naskh] Cairo: Shorouk International.

Al-'Omari, Nadiya. 1985. An-Naskh fi Dirasat al-Usuliyeen: Dirasa Muqarana [Abrogation in the Studies of the Scholars of Jurisprudence Fundamentals: A Comparative Study]. Beirut: Mu’assasat ar-Risala.

Al-Qaysi, Makki ibn Abi-Talib. 1976. Al-Edhah li-Nasikh al-Qu'ran wa Mansukhuh [Explaining the Abrogating and the Abrogated in the Quran]. Edited and verified the authenticity by Ahmad H. Farahat. Riyadh: Imam Muhammad ibn Saud Islamic University.

An-Nahhas, Muhammad as-Saffar. 1905. An-Nasikh wal-Mansookh fil-Qu'ran al-Kareem [The Abrogating and the Abrogated in the Generous Quran]. Edited and verified the authenticity by Ahmad al-Ameen ash-Shanqeeti. Cairo: as-Sa'ada Printing.

Ash-Shafi’i, Mohammad Ibn Idrees. 1979. Ar-Risala [The Treatise]. 2nd ed. Cairo: Maktabat at-Turath.

As-Salih, Subhi. 1969. Mabahith fi 'Uloom al-Qu'ran [Studies in Qur'anic Sciences]. 6th ed. Beirut: Dar al-‘Ilm lil-Malayeen.

As-Siba'i, Mustafa. 1978. As-Sunna wa Makanatuha fi at-Tashri' al-Islami [The Prophet’s Traditions and Its Status in Islamic Legislation]. 2nd ed. Beirut: Al-Maktab Al-Islami.

At-Turabi, Hasan. 1987. Tajdeed al-Fikr al-Islami [Renewing Islamic Thought]. 2nd edition. Jeddah: ad-Dar as-Saudiyya lin-Nashr wat-Tawzee'.

Biltagi, Muhammad. 1977. Manahij at-Tashri’ al-Islami fi al-Qarn al-Thani al-Hijri [Methods of Islamic Legislation in the Second Century of Hijrah]. Riyadh: Imam Muhammad Bin Saud Islamic University.

Burton, John. 1990. The Sources of Islamic Law: Islamic Theories of Abrogation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474465571

Hamid, at-Tijani A. 1995. Usool al-Fikr as-Siyasi fil-Qu'ran al-Makki [The Roots of Political Thought in the Makkan Quran]. Herndon, VA: The International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Ibn al-Jawzi. 1984. Nawasikh al-Qu'ran [That Which Abrogates the Quran]. Edited and verified the authenticity by Muhammad A. A. al-Milbari. Medina: Islamic University.

Ibn Rushd, Abul-Waleed Muhammad. 1994. Ad-Dharoori fi Usulul-Fiqh [Essentials of Fundamentals of Jurisprudence]. Beirut: Dar al-Gharb al-Islami.

Ismail, Sha’ban Muhammad. 1977. Nazariyat an-Naskh fi ash-Sharai' as-Samawiya [Theory of Abrogation in Heavenly-Revealed Laws]. Cairo: Matabi’ ad-Digwi.

Salem, Ahmed A. 2021 [2018]. “The Qu'ran as the Only Constitutive Source of Islamic Law.” Comparative Islamic Studies 14(1-2): 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1558/cis.19109

Sha'ban, Zakiyu-Deen. 1973. Ususul-Fiqh Al-Islami [Fundamentals of Islamic Jurisprudence]. 3rd ed. Benghazi: Benghazi University.

The General Presidency of Islamic Researches, Iftaa, Call and Guidance, ed. n.d. The Holy Quran: English Translation of the Meanings and Commentary. Riyadh: The General Presidency of Islamic Researches, Iftaa, Call and Guidance.

Wafa, Muhammad. 1984. Ahkaam an-Naskh fi ash-Shari’a al-Islamiya [Rules of Abrogation in Islamic Law]. Cairo: Dar at-Tiba’a al-Muhammadiya.

Published

2025-05-06

How to Cite

Salem, A. A. (2025). Integrity of Qur’anic Legislations: A Critical Review of the Debate on Abrogation. Comparative Islamic Studies, 15(1-2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1558/cis.23749