Computer-Assisted Language Learning

From Vision to Reality?


  • Michael D. Bush



CALL, CALL Research and Development, eLearning Specifications, CALL Goals, CALL Implementation, History of CALL


Learning a second language is a challenging endeavor, and, for decades now, proponents of computer-assisted language learning (CALL) have declared that help is on the horizon. As documented not only in the CALICO Journal over its 25-year history but also in other scholarly venues, research has demonstrated the value of CALL. Nevertheless, despite the fact that textbook publishers expend significant effort to include computer-based ancillaries with many of their products, many teachers still rely primarily on the textbook alone. This situation is nothing short of astounding, given the advanced hardware and software capabilities of current delivery systems, unimaginable at the outset but now both available and affordable. Is the quest to implement CALL a fool's errand or is success in fact finally just over the horizon? This article provides (a) a brief historical overview of CALL, including a glimpse at both its pedagogical limitations and strengths; (b) a description of current issues that slow the implementation of CALL; and (c) a sketch of research and development efforts that will help teachers, researchers, and developers move CALL to the next level: A carefully crafted combination of teacher and technology with each contributing according to its comparative advantage.


Bachelder, L. R. (2007). The effect of computer-adaptive control (remediation) on achievement and time on task in foreign language learning. Unpublished master’s thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.

Bannan-Ritland, B. (2008, February 22). Design research and SCORM: From learning object reusability to the reuse of knowledge. Keynote presentation given at the ID+SCORM 2008 Symposium. Retrieved March 31, 2008, from

Biddle, B. J., Godd, T. L., & Goodson I. F. (1997). International handbook of teachers and teaching. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4-16.

Borrás, I., & Lafayette, R. (1994). Effects of multimedia courseware subtitling on the speaking performance of college students of French. The Modern Language Journal, 78(1), 61-75.

Branigan, C. (2008, March 21). Schools respond to iPhone’s popularity. eSchool News. Retrieved April 1, 2008, from;_hbguid=3105ad73-79ea4f2f-96fc-66fa7dc83048&d=top-news

Bunderson, C. V., & Abboud, V. C. (1971, February). A computer-assisted instruction program in the Arabic writing system (Technical Report No. 4). Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED052603)

Bush, M. D. (1989). Banquet Address—CALICO ‘89 at the U.S. Air Force Academy. CALICO Journal, 7(1), 5-15. Retrieved December 2, 2007, from

Bush, M. D. (1997). Implementing technology for language learning. In M. D. Bush & R. M. Terry (Eds.), Technology-enhanced language learning (pp. 287-349). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.

Bush, M. D. (2000). McGraw-Hill 2000 teleconference video: The internet and foreign/second language instruction (G. L. Ervin, Moderator). Available from McGraw-Hill World Languages at

Bush, M. D. (2002). Connecting instructional design to international standards for content reusability. Educational Technology, 42(6), 5-13. Retrieved December 2, 2007, from

Bush, M. D. (2007, September). The knowledge economy, SCORM, and design-based research. ADL Newsletter for Educators and Educational Researchers. Retrieved December 2, 2007, from

Bush, M. D., Anderson, T. A., & Dunster, J. (2005, October 26). An introduction to instructional design patterns. Presentation given in the “Wednesday Seminar,” Department of Instructional Psychology & Technology, Brigham Young University: Provo, UT. Retrieved December 2, 2007, from

Bush, M. D., & Browne, J. M. (2004). Teaching Arabic with technology at BYU: Learning from the past to bridge to the future. CALICO Journal, 21(3), 497-522. Retrieved April 1, 2008, from

Bush, M. D., & Melby, A. K. (2006, July 7). Customized video playback using a standard metadata format. Poster session presented at the Digital Humanities Conference, Paris, France. Retrieved December 2, 2007, from

Bush, M. D., Melby, A. K., Anderson, T. A., Browne, J. M., Hansen, M., & Corradini, R. (2004). Customized video playback: Standards for content description, customization, and personalization. Educational Technology, 44(4), 5-13. Retrieved December 2, 2007, from

Chapelle, C. A. (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning & Technology, 2(1), 22-34. Retrieved December 2, 2007, from

Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Chapelle, C. A. (2005). Hints about CALL use from research. PacCALL, 1(1), 1-8. Retrieved April 8, 2008, from

Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 183-198.

Clifford R., & Granoien, N. (2008). Applications of technology to language acquisition processes: What can work and why. In M. V. Holland & F. P. Fisher (Eds.), The path of speech technologies in computer assisted language learning: From research toward practice (pp. 25-43). London, UK: Routledge Language Learning.

Colpaert, J. (2006). Pedagogy-driven design for online language teaching and learning. CALICO Journal 23(3), 477-497. Retrieved December 2, 2007, from

Crotty, J. (1984). Instruction via an intelligent videodisc system versus classroom instruction for beginning college French students: A comparative experiment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence.

Danan, M. (2004, April). Captioning and subtitling: Undervalued language learning strategies. Meta: Journal des traducteurs. Retrieved December 2, 2007, from

de Bot, K. (2004, June). Foreign language teaching and learning in the Netherlands. Paper presented at the National Language Conference: A Call to Action, University of Maryland, College Park, MD. Retrieved December 2, 2007, from

Dorwick, T. (2002). The changing paradigm: Are we ready for it? Keynote banquet address given at CALICO Symposium 2002, University of California, Davis.

Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 50-80. Retrieved December 2, 2007, from (n.d.). Chess for dummies (2nd ed.). Wiley: Author. Retrieved December 2, 2007, from

Fallahkhair, S., Pemberton, & Griffiths, R. (2005). Dual device user interface design for ubiquitous language learning: Mobile phone and interactive television (iTV). In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE’05). Retrieved December 2, 2008, from

Gass, S. (1988). Integrating research areas: A framework for second language studies. Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 198-217.

Gass, S. (1995). The Illinois PLATO Foreign Languages project. CALICO Journal, 12(4), 15-37. Retrieved December 2, 2007, from

Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hart, R. S. (1981). Language study and the PLATO system. Studies in Language Learning, 3(1), 1-24. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED218930)

Hart, R. S. (1995). The Illinois PLATO foreign languages project. CALICO Journal, 12(4), 15-37. Retrieved December 2, 2007, from

Hoffman, P. (2003, December 17). High over Kitty Hawk, looking for a profit. New York Times. Retrieved December 2, 2007, from

Joiner, E. (1997). Teaching listening: How technology can help. In M. D. Bush & R. M. Terry (Eds.), Technology-enhanced language learning (pp. 77-120). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.

Kramsch, C. (2000). Second language acquisition, applied linguistics, and the teaching of foreign languages. The Modern Language Journal, 84(3), 311-326.

Krashen, S. (1993). The power of reading: Insights from the research. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.

Kurzweil, R. (1999). The age of spiritual machines: When computers exceed human intelligence. New York: Viking.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Reflecting on the cognitive social debate in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91(Focus Issue), 773-787

Magnan, S. S., & Back, M. (2007). Social interaction and linguistic gain during study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 40(1), 43-61.

Marty, F., & Myers, M. K. (1975). Computerized instruction in second-language acquisition. Studies in Language Learning, 1(1), 132-152. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED138037)

McCloskey, P. (2007, July 9). Consensus: Podcasting has no ‘inherent’ pedagogic value. Campus Technology. Retrieved December 2, 2007, from

McFarlin, B. K. (2008). Hybrid lecture-online format increases student grades in an undergraduate exercise physiology course at a large urban university. Advances in Physiology Education, 32(1), 86-91.

Merrill, M. D. (2008, February 22). Should we have standards for linking media, knowledge objects and strategy objects? Keynote presentation given at the ID+SCORM 2008 Symposium. Retrieved March 31, 2008, from

Merrill, M. D., Li, Z., & Jones, M. K. (1992). Instructional transaction shells: Responsibilities, methods, and parameters. Educational Technology, 32(2), 5-27.

Meskill, C. (1996). Listening skills development through multimedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5(2), 179-201.

Metiri Group. (2008). Multimodal learning through media: What the research says (Report commissioned by Cisco). Retrieved April 5, 2008, from

MLA Task Force on Evaluating Scholarship for Tenure and Promotion. (2007). Report of the MLA Task Force on Evaluating Scholarship for Tenure and Promotion. New York: Modern Language Association. Retrieved April 3, 2008, from

Moraco, D. A. (1996). Key vocabulary and guided listening as influences on the listening comprehension of beginning foreign language learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utah State University, Logan, UT.

MPEG. (2004). Multimedia content description interface. Retrieved April 8, 2008, from

Nagata, N. (1998). Input vs. output practice in educational software for second language acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 1(2), 23-40. Retrieved April 2, 2008, from

Negroponte, N. (1994, August). Prime time is my time: The blockbuster myth. Wired, 2(8). Retrieved December 2, 2007, from

Otto, S., & Lyman-Hager, M. A. (2004). Report of the NSEP Evaluation Team: On-site visit to Brigham Young University to evaluate “Developing an Infrastructure for Technology-Enhanced Language Instruction in Critical Languages.” Retrieved April 3, 2008, from

Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: W. W. Norton & Co. Quotations Page. (n.d.). Retrieved December 2, 2007, from

Rimmasch, K. (2007). A process-based CALL assessment: A comparison of input processing and program use behavior by activity type. Unpublished master’s thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.

Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 199–201.

Schrupp, D. M., Bush, M. D., & Mueller, G. A. (1983). Klavier im haus: An interactive experiment in foreign language instruction. CALICO Journal, 1(2), 17-21. Retrieved December 2, 2007, from

Scida, E. E., & Saury, R. E. (2006). Hybrid courses and their impact on student and classroom performance: A case study at the University of Virginia. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 517-531. Retrieved April 26, 2008, from

Smith, F. (1975). Comprehension and learning: A conceptual framework for teachers. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Suppes, P. (1966). The uses of computers in education. Scientific American, 215, 206-220. Retrieved December 2, 2007, from

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371-391.

Verano, M. (1987). Achievement and retention in Spanish presented via videodisc in linear, segmented, and interactive modes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin, TX.



How to Cite

Bush, M. D. (2013). Computer-Assisted Language Learning: From Vision to Reality?. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 443–470.