Paths of Monastic Practice from India to Sri Lanka
Responses to L.S. Cousins’ Work on Scholars and Meditators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/bsrv.36751Keywords:
dhammayoga, dhammakathika, jhāyin, Mahācunda, Nibbāna, Arahat, arahatta, bhāṇaka, atthapada, dhammānusārin, diṭṭhippatta, paññāvimutta, kāyasakkin, ubhātobhāgavimutta, learning, meditation, path, practice, tranquillity, wisdom, insightAbstract
In 1996, L. S Cousins published a groundbreaking piece on paths of monastic practice titled ‘Scholar Monks and Meditator Monks Revisited’ (Powers and Prebish 2009, 31–46). As the title suggests, this work reconsiders the role of two types of monks, doing so by closely analyzing a famous sutta (Mahacunda Sutta, A III 355–356) that depicts a strong dispute between jhayins or ‘meditators’ and dhammayogas, whom scholarship has almost universally defined as ‘scholars’. Because of this, almost all have interpreted this debate as the first sign in early Indian Buddhism of a great bifurcation in the sangha between those concentrating on book learning (pariyatti) and those concentrating on practice (patipatti) — a split that became more and more marked over the centuries until the division became more or less official in medieval Sri Lanka. Cousins convincingly contests this history, with one of his main points being that the dhammayogas were not at all just scholars. Like the meditators, theirs was a practical path that resulted in profound realization of the Dhamma, albeit a different path from that of the meditators. Cousins then goes even further, arguing that the split between scholars and meditators is not very evident in South Asian Buddhist history until the time of Buddhaghosa and thereafter. My intention here is to respond as fully as possible to Cousins’ methods and conclusions, by offering evidence and arguments that sometimes support his work further and sometimes critique his work. This is done in the spirit of spurring on more discussions on this important, complex, and contested issue.
References
Bareau, Andre. 1963. Recherches sur la Biographie du Buddha dans les Sutrapitaka et les Vinayapitaka Anciens. Paris: Publications de l’Ecole Francais d’Extreme-Orient.
Bodhi, Bhikkhu. 2003. ‘Musila and Narada Revisited: Seeking the Key to Interpretation’. In Approaching the Dhamma: Buddhist Texts and Practices in South and Southeast Asia, edited by Anne M. Blackburn and Jeffrey Samuels, 47–68. Seattle: Pariyatti Editions.
———. 2012. The Numerical Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Anguttara Nikaya. Boston, MA: Wisdom Publications.
Buswell, Robert and Robert Gimello, eds. 1992. Paths to Liberation: The Marga and Its Transformations in Buddhist Thought. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Clough, Bradley S. 2012. Early Indian and Theravada Buddhism: Soteriological Controversy and Diversity. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.
Collins, Steven. 1990. ‘On the Very Idea of the Pali Canon’. Journal of the Pali Text Society XV: 89–126.
Cousins, L.S. 1973. ‘Buddhist Jhana: Its Nature and Attainment According to the Pali Sources’. Religion 3: 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-721X(73)90003-1
———. 1984. ‘Samatha-yana and Vipassana-yana’. In Buddhist Studies in Honor of Hammalava Saddhatissa, edited by Gatare Dhammapala, Richard Gombrich and K. R. Norman, 56–68. Nugegoda, Sri Lanka: University of Sri Jayewardenpura.
———. 1996. ‘The Origins of Insight Meditation’. In The Buddhist Forum Vol. IV, edited by Tadeusz Skorupski, 35–58. New Delhi: Heritage Publishers.
———. 2009. ‘Scholar Monks and Meditator Monks Revisted’. In Destroying Mara Forever: Buddhist Ethics Essays in Honor of Damien Keown, edited by John Powers and Charles S. Prebish, 31–46. Ithaca, NY: Snow Lion Publications.
Deegalle, Mahinda. 2006. Popularizing Buddhism: Preaching as Performance in Sri Lanka. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Fauré, Bernard. 1994. Chan Insights and Oversights: An Epistemological Critique of the Chan Tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Finot, Louis. 1901. Rastrapalapariprccha. Saint Petersburg: Imperial Academy of Sciences.
Frauwallner, E. 1956. The Earliest Vinaya and the Beginnings of Buddhist Literature. Rome: ISMEO.
Gombrich, Richard. 1988. Theravada Buddhism: A Social History from Ancient Banares to Modern Colombo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203310878
———. 1990. ‘Recovering the Buddha’s Message’. In The Buddhist Forum, edited by Tadeusz Skorupski, 5–20. London: SOAS.
———. 1997. How Buddhism Began: The Conditioned Genesis of the Early Teachings. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.
Griffiths, Paul. 1981. ’Concentration or Insight: The Problematic of Thervada Buddhist Meditation-Theory’. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 49(4): 606–624. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/XLIX.4.605
Hallisey, Charles. 1990. ‘Apropos the Pali Vinaya as a Historical Document’. Journal of the Pali Text Society XV: 197–208.
———. 1995. ‘Roads Taken and Not Taken in the Study of Theravada Buddhism’. In Curators of the Buddha: The Study of Buddhism Under Colonialism, edited by Donald Lopez, 31–61. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Harvey, Peter. 2013. ‘The Sangha of the Noble Savakas, with Particular Reference to Their Trainee Member, the Person “Practising for the Realization of the Stream-entry-fruit”’. Buddhist Studies Review 30(1): 3–70. https://doi.org/10.1558/bsrv.v30i1.3
Heine, Steven. 1995. Dogen and the Koan Tradition: A Tale of Two Shobogenzo Texts. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Lamotte, Etienne. 1958. Histoire du Bouddhisme Indien des Origines a l’ere Saka. Louvain: Publications Universitaires, Bibliotheque Du Museon.
Ray, Reginald A. 1994. Buddhist Saints in India: A Study in Buddhist Values and Orientations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schopen, Gregory. 1997. Bones, Stones and Buddhist Monks: Collected Papers on the Archaeology, Epigraphy, and Texts of Monastic Buddhism in India. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Wynne, Alexander. 2002. ‘An Interpretation of Released on Both Sides (ubhato-bhaga-vimutti) and the Ramifications for the Study of Early Buddhism’. Buddhist Studies Review 19(1): 31–40.
———. 2007. The Origin of Buddhist Meditation. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203963005
