The Agency of Buddhist Nuns
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/bsrv.v27i1.41Keywords:
Agency, Nuns, Monks, EssentialismAbstract
This article examines how Buddhist literatures construct the agency of Buddhist nuns. The first section explores the Vinaya collections of different schools, and examines the differences between the Bhikkhuni-vibhanga and the Bhikkhu-vibhanga on how nuns are expected to act. The second section explores material on the faculties (indriyas) in the Pali Abhidhamma-pitaka and its commentaries so as to better understand how the abhidhamma analyses of ‘women’s nature’ and ‘men’s nature’ informed conceptions of agency. This article suggests that even though the abhidhamma literature uses such terms as ‘women’s nature’, there is little basis for concluding, as some scholars have done, that Buddhist literature reflects an essentialist view of gender. The fact that the abhidhamma analyses of gender distinguish between ‘male faculties’ and ‘female faculties’ does not appear to make a difference in the agency accorded to nuns: nuns, like monks, are expected to behave in certain ways independent of the fact that they have ‘female faculties’ and thus are inclined toward certain kinds of stereotypically female behaviour.
References
Ahearn, Laura. 2001. ‘Language and Agency’. Annual Review of Anthropology 30: 109–137. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109
Bapat, P. V.. 1957. ‘Change of Sex in Buddhist Literature’. In Felicitation Volume Presented to Professor Sripad Krishna Belvalkar, edited by S. Radhakrishnan et al., 209–215. Banaras: Motilal Banarsidas.
Bapat, P. V., and Akira Hirakawa, eds. 1970. Shan-Chien-P’i-P’o-Sha: A Chinese Version of Samantapasadika by Sanghabhadra, Commentary on Pali Vinaya, Bhandarkar. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.
Biernacki, Loriliai. 2007. The Renowned Goddess of Desire: Women, Sex and Speech in Tantra. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chung, In Young. 1999. ‘A Buddhist View of Women: A Comparative Study of the Rules for Bhiksunis and Bhiksus Based on the Chinese Pratimoksa’. Journal of Buddhist Ethics 6: 29–105.
Derrett, J. Duncan M. 2006. ‘Monastic Masturbation in Buddhist Texts’. Journal of the History of Sexuality 15 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1353/sex.2006.0050
Faure, Bernard. 1998. The Red Thread: Buddhist Approaches to Sexuality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gyatso, Janet. 2003. ‘One Plus One Makes Three: Buddhist Gender, Monasticism, and the Law of the Non-Excluded Middle’. History of Religions 43 (2): 89–115. doi:10.1086/423006
Harvey, Peter. 2000. An Introduction to Buddhist Ethics: Foundation, Values, and Issues, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heirman, Ann. 2002. Rules for Nuns According to the DharmaguptakaVinaya: The Discipline in Four Parts. Vol. 49, Buddhist Tradition Series. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
von Hinüber, Oskar. 1994. Selected Papers on Pali Studies. Oxford: The Pali Text Society.
Hirakawa, Akira. 1982. Monastic Discipline for the Buddhist Nuns: An English Translation of the Chinese Text of the Mahasamghika-Bhiksuni-Vinaya, Tibetan Sanskrit Works Series. Patna: Kashi Prasad Jayaswal Research Institute.
Kabilsingh, Chatsumarn. 1988. The Bhikkhuni Patimokkha of the Six Schools. 1st Indian edition, Bibliotheca Indo-Buddhica Series. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.
Juo-Hsüeh Shih, Bhikkhuni. 2000. Controversies over Buddhist Nuns. Oxford: Pali Text Society.
Karunadasa, Y. 1997. Buddhist Analysis of Matter. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Department of Cultural Affairs.
Kieffer-Pülz, Petra. 2001. ‘Parajika 1 and Sanghadisesa 1: Hitherto Untranslated Passages from the Vinayapitaka of the Theravadins’. Traditional South Asian Medicine 6: 62–84.
Maung Tin, Pe and C.A.F. Rhys Davids. [1921] 1958. The Expositor (Atthasalini). London: Luzac and Co.
Nolot, Edith.19991. Règles De Discipline Des Nonnes Bouddhistes: Le BhiksuniVinaya De L’école Mahasamghika-Lokottaravadin, Publications De L’institut De Civilisation Indienne. Paris: Diffusion de Boccard.
Norman, K.R. and William Pruit, eds. 2003. Kankhavitarani. London: Pali Text Society.
Perera, L.P.N. 1993. Sexuality in Ancient India: A Study Based on the Pali Vinayapitaka. Kelaniya: Postgraduate Institute of Pali and Buddhist Studies, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.
Schopen, Gregory. 2004. Buddhist Monks and Business Matters: Still More Papers on Monastic Buddhism in India. Edited by Luis O. Gomez, Studies in the Buddhist Traditions. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i.
Sweet, Michael J. and Leonard Zwilling. 1993. ‘The First Medicalization: The Taxonomy and Etiology of Queerness in Classical Indian Medicine’. Journal of the History of Sexuality 3 (4): 590–607.
Wijayaratna, Môhan. 2001. Buddhist Nuns: The Birth and Development of a Women’s Monastic Order. Colombo: Wisdom.
Wilson, Liz. 1996. Charming Cadavers: Horrific Figurations of the Feminine in Indian Buddhist Hagiographic Literature. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Young, Serenity. 2004. Courtesans and Tantric Consorts: Sexualities in Buddhist Narrative, Iconographies, and Ritual. New York: Routledge Press.
Zwilling, Leonard. 1992. ‘Homosexuality as Seen in Indian Buddhist Texts’. In Buddhism, Sexuality, and Gender, edited by J. I. Cabezón, 203–214. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Zwilling, Leonard and Michael J. Sweet. 1996. ‘“Like a City Ablaze”: The Third Sex and the Creation of Sexuality. Jain Religious Literature 6 (3): 359–384.
