Epistemology of the Brahmajala Sutta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/bsrv.v26i1.67Keywords:
Brahmajāla Sutta, Buddhist EpistemologyAbstract
The Brahmajala Sutta includes a list of ‘views’ that are wrong in some sense. The present paper turns the focus away from the content of the views to ask in what sense they are problematic, by what criteria they are here found to be so, and, indeed, just what kinds of things the views are. The framework in which the views are set suggests that what the Buddha finds problematic is not the content so much as the epistemological standpoint, or, more properly, the mode-of-being of which the views are a part: it is the samana-brahmanas who proclaim the views rather than the views per se that are wrong.
References
Bodhi, Bhikkhu, trans. 2007. The Discourse on the All-Embracing Net of Views: The Brahmajala Sutta and its Commentaries. 2nd Edition. Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society.
Buddhadatta Mahathera. 1994. Concise Pali-English Dictionary. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Private Limited.
Chattha Sangayana. CD-ROM Version 3. Vipassana Research Institute.
Evans, Stephen A. 2007. ‘Doubting the Kalama Sutta: Epistemology, Ethics, and the “Sacred”’. Buddhist Studies Review 24(1): 91–107. doi:10.1558/bsrv.v24i1.91
———. 2008. ‘Payasi as Scientist: A Nikayan Critique of Scientific Method’. Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya Journal of Buddhist Studies, 1: 53–51.
Hoffman, Frank J. 1982. ‘The Buddhist Empiricism Thesis’. Religious Studies 18: 151–158.
Jayatilleke, K.N. 1963. Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Ñanamoli, Bhikkhu. 1994. A Pali-English Glossary of Buddhist Technical Terms. Edited by Bhikkhu Bodhi. Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society.
Rhys Davids, T.W. 1899. ‘Introduction to the Brahmajala Sutta’. In Dialogues of the Buddha, translated by T.W. Rhys Davids, xxv–xxvii. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walshe, Maurice, trans. 1987. Thus Have I Heard: The Long Discourses of The Buddha (Dighanikaya). London: Wisdom Publications.
