Two Concepts of Meditation and Three Kinds of Wisdom in Kamalasila’s Bhavanakramas
A Problem of Translation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/bsrv.v23i1.71Keywords:
Tibetan Buddhsim, Meditation, TranslationAbstract
A close reading of the three Bhavanakramah texts, written by Kamalasila (740–795 CE), reveals that their author was aware of two competing concepts of meditation prevalent in Tibet at the time of their composition. The two concepts of meditation,associated with the Sanskrit words bhavana and dhyana, can be related respectively to the Indian and Chinese sides of the well-known debates at bSam yas. The account of the Mahayana path outlined in these texts implies an acceptance of the precedence of bhavana over dhyana. In this paper I argue that Kamalasila advocated bhavana – a conception of meditation which encompasses non-conceptual dhyana, but which also includes a discernment of reality (bhuta-pratyaveksa) that is conceptual in nature. Such conceptual discernment should not be understood simply as a process of ordinary rational understanding (cintamayi prajña) but rather as constituting a special kind of meditative wisdom (bhavanamayi prajña). A failure to recognize the subtle differences between Kamalasila’s employment of the terms dhyana and bhavana, along with his advocacy of the latter, could easily lead to mistranslation and, with this, a basic misunderstanding of his position. In particular, it could lead to a conception of insight (vipasyana) that is overly intellectual in nature. Given the historically important role that these texts played in the formation of Tibetan Buddhism, the implications of such a misconception could be far-reaching. This paper attempts to clarify the key meditation terminology found in the Bhavanakramas as well as demonstrate the rationale for using ‘meditation’ as the default translation for bhavana.
References
Adam, Martin T., 2002. ‘Buddhism and Hermeneutics’. Focus Pragensis, vol. II, pp. 95–113.
Balagangadhara, S. N., 2005. ‘How to Speak for the Indian Traditions: An Agenda for the Future’. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, vol. 73(4), pp. 987–1013.
Conze, Edward, 1973. Buddhist Thought in India. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Conze, Edward, 1975. Further Buddhist Studies: Selected Essays. Oxford: Bruno Cassirer.
Crangle, Edward Fitzpatrick, 1994. The Origin and Development of Early Indian Contemplative Practice. Wiebadan: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Fillion, C. M., 2004. The Role of Scriptural Testimony, Reason and Spiritual Practice in The Upadesasahasri: A Non-commentarial Work of Sankara. Unpublished Masters thesis, McGill University.
Gethin, Rupert, 1992. The Buddhist Path To Awakening. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Gethin, Rupert, 1998. The Foundations of Buddhism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gomez, Louis O., 1983. ‘Indian Materials on the Doctrine of Sudden Enlightenment’. In Early Ch’an in China and Tibet, Whalen Lai & Lewis R. Lancaster (eds), pp. 393–434. Berkeley, CA: Asian Humanities Press.
Gomez, Louis O., 1987. ‘Purifying Gold: The Metaphor of Effort and Intuition in Buddhist Thought and Practice’. In Sudden and Gradual: Approaches to Enlightenment in Chinese Thought, Peter N. Gregory (ed.), pp. 67–165. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Goshima, Kiyotaka, 1983. The Tibetan Text of the Second Bhavanakramah. Kyoto (self-published, Showado printing).
Griffi ths, Paul J., 1983. ‘Indian Buddhist Meditation Theory: History, Development and Systematization’. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Griffi ths, Paul J., 1986. On Being Mindless. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications. [Reprint 1999.]
Hayes, Richard, 1988. Dignaga on the Interpretation of Signs. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kajiyama, Yuichi, 1991. ‘Later Madhyamikas on Epistemology and Meditation’. In Mahayana Buddhist Meditation: Theory and Practice, Minoru Kiyota (ed.), pp. 114–43. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Klein, Anne, 1986. Knowledge and Liberation: Tibetan Buddhist Epistemology in Support of Transformative Religious Experience. Ithaca, NY: Snow Lion Publications.
Lamotte, Étienne, 1935. Le Samdhinirmocanasutra: L’explication des Mystères. Louvain: Université de Louvain.
Lopez, Jr., Donald S., 1987. A Study of Svatantrika. Ithaca, NY: Snow Lion Publications.
Lopez, Jr., Donald S., 1993. ‘On the Interpretation of the Mahayana Sutras’. In Buddhist Hermeneutics, D. Lopez Jr. (ed.). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Ñanamoli, Bhikkhu, 1991. The Path of Purification (Visuddhimagga of Buddhaghosa). Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society. [Reprint.]
Namdol, Gyaltsen, 1997. Bhavanakramah of Acarya Kamalasila (Tibetan Version, Sanskrit Restoration and Hindi Translation). Sarnath: Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies.
Nichols, Brian, 2005. ‘Elaborations of the Threefold Typology of Wisdom from Vasubandhu to Kamalasila: A Consideration of the Relationship between Reflection and Meditation’. Unpublished paper delivered at the Eastern Division Meeting of the American Philosophical Association (International Society of Buddhist Philosophy subpanel), New York.
Olivelle, Patrick, 1996. Upanisads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pagel, Ulrich, 1995. The Bodhisattvapitaka: Its Doctrines and their Position in Mahayana Literature. Tring: The Institute of Buddhist Studies.
Powers, John, 1995. Wisdom of Buddha: The Samdhinirmocana Sutra. Berkeley, CA: Dharma Publishing.
Prévèreau, Raynald, 1994. ‘Dharmakirti’s Account of Yogic Intuition as a Source of Knowledge’. Unpublished Masters thesis, McGill University.
Ruegg, David Seyfort, 1989. Buddha-Nature, Mind, and the Problem of Gradualism in a Comparative Perspective. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.
Ruegg, David Seyfort, 1992. ‘On the Tibetan Historiography and Doxography of the “Great Debate at bSam yas”’. In Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the 5th Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies 1989, pp. 237–44. Narita: Naritasan Shinshoji.
Ryusei, Keira, 1999. Madhyamika and Epistemology: A Study of Kamalasila’s Method for Proving the Voidness of All Dharmas; Introduction, Annotated Translations and Tibetan Texts of Selected Sections of the Second Chapter of the Madhyamakaloka. Unpublished PhD thesis, Université de Laussane.
Schmithausen, Lambert, 1976. ‘On the Problem of the Relationship of Spiritual Practice and Philosophical Theory in Buddhism’. In German Scholars on India Vol. II, pp. 235–50. Bombay: Nachiketa Publications.
Schmithausen, Lambert, 1981. ‘On Some Aspects of Descriptions or Theories of “Liberating Insight” and “Enlightenment” in Early Buddhism’. In Studien Zum Jainismus und Buddhismus, pp. 199–250. Hamburg: Franz Steiner Verlag GmbH Wiesbaden.
Skilton, Andrew, 2002. ‘State or Statement? Samadhi in Some Early Mahayana Sutras’. The Eastern Buddhist, vol. 34(2), pp. 51–93.
Sopa, Geshe, 1991. ‘Samathavipasyanayuganaddha: The Two Leading Principles of Buddhist Meditation’. In Mahayana Buddhist Meditation: Theory and Practice, Minoru Kiyota (ed.), Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, pp. 46–65.
Taniguchi, Fujio, 1992, ‘Quotations from the First Bhavanakramah of Kamalasila Found in Some Indian Texts’. In Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the 5th Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies 1989, pp. 303–7. Narita: Naritasan Shinshoji.
Thurman, Robert, 1978. ‘Buddhist Hermeneutics’. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, vol. 46, pp. 19–39.
Tucci, Giuseppe, 1958. Minor Buddhist Texts, Part II, First Bhavanakramah. Rome: Serie Orientale Roma ix. 2/ Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. [Reprinted 1986.]
Tucci, Giuseppe, 1971. Minor Buddhist Texts, Part III, Third Bhavanakramah. Roma: Instituto Italiano per il Medio Ed Estremo Oriente.
Vaidya, P. L. (ed.), 1961. Samadhirajasutra. Darbhanga: The Mithila Institute.
Vetter, Tilmann, 1988. The Ideas and Meditative Practices of Early Buddhism. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Wallace, B. Alan, 1998. The Bridge Of Quiescence: Experiencing Tibetan Buddhist Meditation. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
Williams, Paul, 1989. Mahayana Buddhism. London: Routledge.
Williams, Paul, 1991. ‘On the Interpretation of Madhyamaka Thought’. Journal of Indian Philosophy, vol. 19, pp. 191–218.
