The Critical Zone as a Planetary Animist Sphere

Etho-graphing an Affective Consciousness of the Earth

Authors

  • Dan Smyer Yu Yunnan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.39680

Keywords:

affective consciousness, Critical Zone, Gaia, metaphoric animism, ethographies

Abstract

This article offers a new animist study of ‘the affective consciousness of earth’ to explore deeper meanings and values of the earth as a planetary life system. Woven together as an interdisciplinary text with perspectives, concepts, and imaginative visions from earth sciences, religion and ecology, and environmental humanities, it introduces a conceptual proposition that the earth’s Critical Zone is a planetary animist sphere for the purpose of highlighting the livingness of the earth as a union of the biotic and the abiotic worlds. By interfacing relevant planetary perspectives from humanities and natural sciences, it argues that the metaphor of Gaia, as employed in geophysiology, inadvertently engenders a metaphoric animism that is a form of new animism in which the livingness of the earth is expressed in biochemical, sentient, and affective terms. The recognized complementarity of Critical Zone science and new animist studies in this article is meant to articulate a planetary environmental consciousness that is a hybrid of scientific and humanist endeavors for environmental sustainability. 

Author Biography

Dan Smyer Yu, Yunnan University

Anthropologist specializing in religion and ecology, landscape studies, modern Tibetan studies, environmental humanities

References

Abram, David. 1997. The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World (New York: Vintage Books).

Ahuja, Neel. 2009. ‘Postcolonial Critique in a Multispecies World’, PMLA 124 (2): 556-63. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2009.124.2.556.

Amundson, Ronald, Daniel D. Richter, Geoff S. Humphreys, Esteban G. Jobbágy, and Jérôme Gaillardet. 2007. ‘Coupling between Biota and Earth Materials in the Critical Zone’, Elements 3: 327-32. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.3.5.327.

Anderlini-D’Onofrio, Serena. 2004. ‘The Gaia Hypothesis and Ecofeminism: Culture Reason, and Symbiosis’, disClosure: A Journal of Social Theory 13: 65-93.

Arènes, Alexandra, Bruno Latour, and Jérôme Gaillardet. 2018. ‘Giving Depth to the Surface: An Exercise in the Gaia-graphy of Critical Zones’, The Anthropocene Review 5.2: 120-35. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019618782257.

Balikci, Anna. 2008. Lamas, Shamans and Ancestors: Village Religion in Sikkim (Leiden: Brill). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004167063.i-406.

Bauman, Whitney. 2014. Religion and Ecology: Developing a Planetary Ethic (New York: Columbia University Press). Doi: https://doi.org/10.7312/baum16342.

Bawaka Country, including Sandie Suchet-Pearson, Sarah Wright, Kate Lloyd, and Laklak Burarrwanga. 2013. ‘Bawaka Country: Towards an Ontology of Co-becoming in Natural Resource Management’, Asia Pacific Viewpoint 54.2: 185-97. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12018.

Bawaka Country, Sarah Wright, Sandie Suchet-Pearson, Kate Lloyd, Laklak Burarrwanga, Ritjilili Ganambarr, Merrkiyawuy Ganambarr-Stubbs, Banbapuy Ganambarr, Djawundil Maymuru, and Jill Sweeney. 2015. ‘Co-becoming Bawaka: Towards a Relational Understanding of Place/Space’, Progress in Human Geography 40.4: 20pp. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515589437.

Bennet, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things (Durham: Duke University Press). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623.

Berry, Thomas. 2009. The Sacred Universe: Earth, Spirituality, and Religion in the Twenty First Century (New York: Columbia University Press).

Booth, Annie L. 2003. ‘We Are the Land: Native American Views of Nature’, in Helaine Selin (ed.), Nature Across Cultures: Views of Nature and the Environment in Non-Western Cultures (Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers): 329-50. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0149-5_17.

Brantley, Susan, William H. McDowell, William E. Dietrich, Timothy S. White, Praveen Kumar, Suzanne P. Anderson, Jon Chorover, Kathleen Ann Lohse, Roger C. Bales, Daniel D. Richter, Gordon Grant, and Jérôme Gaillardet. 2017. ‘Designing a Network of Critical Zone Observatories to Explore the Living Skin of the Terrestrial Earth’, Earth Surface Dynamics 5: 841-60. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-841-2017.

Descola, Philippe. 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). Doi: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226145006.001.0001.

Dybas, Cheryl. 2013. ‘Discoveries in the Critical Zone: Where Life Meets Rock’, Critical Zone Observatories, U.S. NSF National Program. Online: https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2013/nsf13112/nsf13112.pdf.

Grim, John (ed.). 2017. ‘Nature Spiritualities—Introduction’, in Willis Jenkins, Mary Evelyn Tucker, and John Grim (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Religion and Ecology (London: Routledge): 209-10.

Hallowell, A. Irving. 2002. ‘Ojibwa Ontology, Behavior, and World View’, in Graham Harvey (ed.), Readings in Indigenous Religions (London: Continuum): 17-49. Doi: https://doi.org/10.7312/diam92410-005.

Haraway, Donna. 2008. When Species Meet (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

Haraway, Donna. 2016a. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene (Durham: Duke University Press). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373780.

Haraway, Donna. 2016b. ‘Chthulucene Manifesto from Santa Cruz’. Revised from ‘Donna Haraway and Cary Wolfe in Conversation’, Manifestly Haraway (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press). Online: https://laboratoryplanet.org/en/manifeste-chthulucene-de-santa-cruz/. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816650477.001.0001.

Harding, Stephan. 2006. Animate Earth: Science, Intuition and Gaia (White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing).

Harvey, Graham. 1997. Contemporary Paganism: Listening People, Speaking Earth (New York: New York University Press).

Harvey, Graham. 2005. Animism: Respecting the Living World (New York: Columbia University Press).

Harvey, Graham. 2012. ‘An Animist Manifesto’, Philosophy, Activism, Nature 9: 2-4.

Harvey, Graham. 2017. ‘Paganism and Animism’, in Willis Jenkins, Mary Evelyn Tucker, and John Grim (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Religion and Ecology (London: Routledge): 211-19.

Harvey, Graham (ed.). 2013. The Handbook of Contemporary Animism (London: Routledge). Doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315728964.

Hogan, Linda. 2013. ‘We Call it Tradition’, in Graham Harvey (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Animism (London: Routledge): 17-26.

Ingold, Tim. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill (London: Routledge).

Jenkins, Willis. 2017. ‘Whose Religion? Which Ecology? Religious Studies in the Environmental Humanities’, in W. Jenkins, M.E. Tucker, and J. Grim (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Religion and Ecology Routledge (London: Routledge): 22-32. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315764788.

Latour, Bruno. 2014. ‘How to Make Sure Gaia Is Not a God of Totality?’, written for the Rio De Janeiro meeting The Thousand Names of Gaia. Online: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/138-THOUSAND-NAMES_0.pdf.

Lenton, Timothy M. 1998. ‘Gaia and Natural Selection’, Nature 394: 439-47. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/28792.

Lévy-Bruhl, Lucien. 1923. Primitive Mentality (New York: MacMillan).

Lovelock, James. 2000. Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Lovelock, James. 2005. ‘Gaian Pilgrimage’, in Bron Taylor (ed.), Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature (London: Continuum): 683-86.

Lovelock, James. 2006. The Revenge of Gaia: Why the Earth is Fighting Back—and How We Can Still Save Humanity (London: Penguin Books).

Margulis, Lynn. 1995. ‘Gaia is a Tough Bitch’, in John Brockman (ed.), The Third Culture (New York: Touchstone): 129-51.

Margulis, Lynn. 1998. Symbiotic Planet: A New Look at Evolution (Amherst, MA: Basic Books).

Monaghan, Patricia. 2005. ‘Gaia’, in Bron Taylor (ed.), Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature (London: Continuum): 667-68.

O’Brien, Kevin. 2010. An Ethics of Biodiversity: Christianity, Ecology, and the Variety of Life (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press).

Orenstein, Gloria Feman. 2003. ‘The Greening of Gaia: Ecofeminist Artists Revisit the Garden’, Ethics and the Environment 8.1: 103-11. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/een.2003.0009.

Pardee, Cambry. 2013. ‘Making Earth Heaven: Ecological Implications of Genesis 1–3’, Leaven 21.3. Online: http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/leaven/vol21/iss3/3.

Pike, Sarah M. 2001. Earthly Bodies Magical Selves: Contemporary Pagans and the Search for Community (Berkeley: University of California Press). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520923805.

Pike, Sarah M. 2004. New Age and Neopagan Religions in America (New York: Columbia University Press).

Pike, Sarah M. 2016. Lecture ‘Where Are Religions and Religious Studies in the Environ­mental Humanities?’, Harvard Divinity School. Lecture notes taken by Dan Smyer Yü.

Plumwood, Val. 2009. ‘Nature in the Active Voice’, Australian Humanities Review 46: 113-29. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22459/AHR.46.2009.10.

Primavesi, Anne. 2000. Sacred Gaia: Holistic Theology and Earth System Science (London: Routledge).

Richter, Daniel deB., and Sharon A. Billings. 2015. ‘One Physical System: Tansley’s Ecosystem as Earth’s Critical Zone’, New Phytologist 206: 900-912. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13338.

Ricoeur, Paul. 1977. The Rule of Metaphor (trans. Robert Czerny with Kathleen McLaughlin and John Costellos; Toronto: University of Toronto Press).

Rose, Deborah Bird. 1996. Nourishing Terrains: Australian Aboriginal Views of Landscape and Wilderness (Canberra: Australian Heritage Commission).

Rose, Deborah Bird. 2013. ‘Val Plumwood’s Philosophical Animism: Attentive Interactions in the Sentient World’. Environmental Humanities 3: 93-109. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3611248.

Rose, Deborah Bird, Thom van Dooren, Matthew Chrulew, Stuart Cooke, Matthew Kearnes, and Emily O’Gorman. 2012. ‘Thinking Through the Environment, Unsettling the Humanities’, Environmental Humanities 1: 1-5. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3609940.

Smyer Yü, Dan. 2014. ‘Sentience of the Earth: Eco-Buddhist Mandalizing of Dwelling Place in Amdo, Tibet’, Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture 8.4: 483-501. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.v8i4.19481.

Smyer Yü, Dan. 2015. Mindscaping the Landscape of Tibet: Place, Memorability, Ecoaesthetics (Boston: de Gruyter). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514237.

Taylor, Bron. 2008. ‘From the Ground Up: Dark Green Religion and the Environ­mental Future’, in Donald K. Swearer (ed.), Ecology and the Environment: Perspectives from the Humanities (Cambridge: Harvard University Press): 89-107.

Tucker, Mary Evelyn, and John Grim. 2001. ‘Introduction: The Emerging Alliance of World Religions and Ecology’, Daedalus 130.4: 1-22.

Tylor, Edward B. 1920. Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Language, Art, and Custom, vol. 1 (London: John Murray).

Van Dooren, Thom, and Deborah Bird Rose. 2016. ‘Lively Ethography: Storying Animist Worlds’, Environmental Humanities 8.1: 77-94. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3527731.

Van Dooren, Thom, Eben Kirksey, and Ursula Münster. 2016. ‘Multispecies Studies: Cultivating Arts of Attentiveness’, Environmental Humanities 8.1: 1-23. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3527695.

Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 1998. ‘Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism’, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4.3: 469-88. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3034157.

Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2012. Cosmological Perspectivism in Amazonia and Elsewhere (Manchester, UK: HAU Masterclass Series).

White, Timothy, Susan Brantley, Steve Banwart, Jon Chorover, William Dietrich, Lou Derry, Kathleen Lohse, Suzanne Anderson, Anthony Aufdendkampe, Roger Bales, Praveen Kumar, Dan Richter, and Bill McDowell. 2015. ‘The Role of Critical Zone Observatories in Critical Zone Science’, Developments in Earth Surface Processes 19: 15-78. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63369-9.00002-1.

Woods, Mark. 2017. Rethinking Wilderness (Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press).

Published

2020-10-02

How to Cite

Smyer Yu, D. (2020). The Critical Zone as a Planetary Animist Sphere: Etho-graphing an Affective Consciousness of the Earth. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, 14(2), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.39680

Issue

Section

Perspectives