Religion as a Testing Ground for Cognitive Science

Authors

  • Andrew Shtulman Occidental College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.20641

Keywords:

Intuitive dualism, God concepts, Afterlife beliefs, Folk theories, Religious cognition

Abstract

Research at the intersection of cognitive science and religion can illuminate the cognitive underpinnings of religious thought and behavior, as White (2021) persuasively demonstrates in her comprehensive synthesis of CSR research, but this research can also constrain broader theories of cognition. Here, I examine CSR research relevant to a prominent theory of how we represent minds and bodies: intuitive dualism. This theory, which posits that folk psychology and folk physics are not initially integrated in our representations of intentional agents, makes predictions about god concepts and afterlife beliefs that are not supported by empirical research on these topics. Rather, CSR research suggests that dualism varies by culture and context and must be learned. This case study highlights the reciprocal relation between cognitive science and the study of religion and points to the mutual benefits of their integration.

References

Banerjee, K., Haque, O. S., & Spelke, E. S. (2013). Melting lizards and crying mailboxes: Children’s preferential recall of minimally counterintuitive concepts. Cognitive Science, 37, 1251–1289. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12037

Barlev, M., Mermelstein, S., Cohen, A. S., & German, T. C. (2019). The embodied God: Core intuitions about person physicality coexist and interfere with acquired Christian beliefs about God, the Holy Spirit, and Jesus. Cognitive Science, 43, e12784. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12784 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12784

Barlev, M., Mermelstein, S., & German, T. C. (2017). Core intuitions about persons coexist and interfere with acquired Christian beliefs about God. Cognitive Science, 41, 425–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12435 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12435

———. (2018). Representational co-existence in the God concept: Core knowledge intuitions of God as a person are not revised by Christian theology despite lifelong experience. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 2330–2338. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1421-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1421-6

Barlev, M., & Shtulman, A. (2021). Minds, bodies, spirits, and gods: Does widespread belief in disembodied beings imply that we are inherent dualists? Psychological Review, 128, 1007–1021. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000298

Barrett, H. C., Bolyanatz, A., Broesch, T., Cohen, E., Froerer, P., Kanovsky, M., Schug, M. G., & Laurence, S. (2021). Intuitive dualism and afterlife beliefs: A cross-cultural study. Cognitive Science, 45, e12992. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12992 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12992

Barrett, J. L., & Keil, F. C. (1996). Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in God concepts. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1996.0017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1996.0017

Barrett, J. L., & Richert, R. A. (2003). Anthropomorphism or preparedness? Exploring children’s God concepts. Review of Religious Research, 44, 300–312. https://doi.org/10.2307/3512389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3512389

Bering, J. M. (2002). Intuitive conceptions of dead agents’ minds: The natural foundations of afterlife beliefs as phenomenological boundary. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 2, 263–308. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685370260441008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685370260441008

———. (2006). The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X06009101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X06009101

Bloom, P. (2005). Descartes’ baby: How the science of child development explains what makes us human. New York: Basic Books.

———. (2007). Religion is natural. Developmental Science, 10, 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00577.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00577.x

Boyer, P., & Ramble, C. (2001). Cognitive templates for religious concepts: Cross-cultural evidence for recall of counter-intuitive representations. Cognitive Science, 25, 535–564. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2504_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2504_2

Cohen, E., & Barrett, J. (2008). When minds migrate: Conceptualizing spirit possession. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8, 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1163/156770908X289198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156770908X289198

Demertzi, A., Liew, C., Ledoux, D., Bruno, M. A., Sharpe, M., Laureys, S., & Zeman, A. (2009). Dualism persists in the science of mind. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1157, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.04117.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.04117.x

Forstmann, M., Burgmer, P., & Mussweiler, T. (2012). “The mind is willing, but the flesh is weak”: The effects of mind-body dualism on health behavior. Psychological Science, 23, 1239–1245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612442392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612442392

Gray, K., Knobe, J., Sheskin, M., Bloom, P., & Barrett, L. F. (2011). More than a body: Mind perception and the nature of objectification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1207–1220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025883

Guthrie, S. (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harris, P. L. (2011). Conflicting thoughts about death. Human Development, 54, 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1159/000329133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000329133

Hodge, K. M. (2008). Descartes’ mistake: How afterlife beliefs challenge the assumption that humans are intuitive Cartesian substance dualists. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8, 387–415. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853708X358236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853708X358236

Hook, C. J., & Farah, M. J. (2013). Look again: Effects of brain images and mind-brain dualism on lay evaluations of research. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1397–1405. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00407

Ladd, K. L., McIntosh, D. N., & Spilka, B. (1998). Children’s God concepts: Influences of denomination, age, and gender. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 8, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0801_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0801_6

Lane, J. D., Zhu, L., Evans, E. M., & Wellman, H. M. (2016). Developing concepts of the mind, body, and afterlife: Exploring the roles of narrative context and culture. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 16, 50–82. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342168

Norenzayan, A. (2013) Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400848324

Nye, W. C., & Carlson, J. S. (1984). The development of the concept of God in children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 145, 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1984.10532259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1984.10532259

Preston, J. L., Ritter, R. S., & Hepler, J. (2013). Neuroscience and the soul: Competing explanations for the human experience. Cognition, 127, 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.003

Purzycki, B. G., Finkel, D. N., Shaver, J., Wales, N., Cohen, A. B., & Sosis, R. (2012). What does God know? Supernatural agents’ access to socially strategic and non-strategic information. Cognitive Science, 36, 846–869. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01242.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01242.x

Richert, R. A., Shaman, N. J., Saide, A. R., & Lesage, K. A. (2016). Folding your hands helps God hear you: Prayer and anthropomorphism in parents and children. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 27, 140–157. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004322035_010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004322035_010

Riekki, T., Lindeman, M., Aleneff, M., Halme, A., & Nuortimo, A. (2013). Paranormal and religious believers are more prone to illusory face perception than skeptics and non-believers. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2874 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2874

Saide, A. R., & Richert, R. A. (2020). Socio-cognitive and cultural influences on children’s concepts of God. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 20, 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340072

Shtulman, A. (2008). Variation in the anthropomorphization of supernatural beings and its implications for cognitive theories of religion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1123–1138. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0278-7393.34.5.1123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.5.1123

Shtulman, A., Foushee, R., Barner, D., Dunham, Y., & Srinivasan, M. (2019). When Allah meets Ganesha: Developing supernatural concepts in a religiously diverse society. Cognitive Development, 52, 100806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.100806 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.100806

Shtulman, A., & Lindeman, M. (2016). Attributes of God: Conceptual foundations of a foundational belief. Cognitive Science, 40, 635–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12253

Shtulman, A., & Rattner, M. (2018). Theories of God: Explanatory coherence in religious cognition. PLoS ONE, 13, e0209758. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209758 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209758

Shtulman, A., & Valcarcel, J. (2012). Scientific knowledge suppresses but does not supplant earlier intuitions. Cognition, 124, 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.005

Shtulman, A., & Young, A. G. (2020). Why do logically incompatible explanations seem psychologically compatible? Science, pseudoscience, religion, and superstition. In K. McCain & K. Kampourakis (Eds.), Scientific knowledge? An introduction to contemporary epistemology of science (pp. 163–178). London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203703809-11

White, C. (2015). Establishing personal identity in reincarnation: Minds and bodies reconsidered. The Journal of Cognition and Culture, 15, 403–430. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342158

———. (2016). The cognitive foundations of reincarnation. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 28, 264–286. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341381

———. (2021). An introduction to the cognitive science of religion: Connecting evolution, brain, cognition and culture. London: Routledge.

Willard, A. K. & Norenzayan, A. (2013). Cognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in life’s purpose. Cognition, 129, 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.016

Published

2022-04-20

How to Cite

Shtulman, A. . (2022). Religion as a Testing Ground for Cognitive Science. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 7(2), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.20641

Issue

Section

Book Panel