The Processes of Believing, Mental Abnormalities, and Other Matters of the Mind

Where Do They Come From? What Are They Good For?

Authors

  • Rüdiger J. Seitz Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf
  • Hans-Ferdinand Angel Karl-Franzens-University Graz
  • Raymond F. Paloutzian Westmont College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.19559

Keywords:

belief, believing, brain function, neuropsychology, credition, fundamental mental process, meaning, meaning making, mental abnormality, mental disorders, religious experience, religious cognition, naturalism

Abstract

Two categories of mental events – ecstatic or indescribable religious revelations and bizarre beliefs or behavior with related mental abnormalities – have been compared and contrasted in order to understand whether they are manifestations of different basic neural and psychological processes, or fundamentally the same. In popular terms, such comparisons point to the issue of the relationship between being religious and being mentally ill. McCauley and Graham (2020) have argued for a benign “maturational naturalism” (MN) as an over-arching concept to subsume and understand the two approaches. MN rests on the assumption that for purposes of understanding the processes that mediate any “matters of the mind,” it makes no difference whether they are labeled religious or not. All must be functions of maturationally natural processes, or else they would not occur. Whether they are labeled “religious” or “mental illness,” or whether an extra-world agent or spirit was involved, is left for others to discuss. There is a gap in their analysis, however: They refer to beliefs (religious, delusional, evidence-based), but do not adequately clarify the processes from which they spring or what believing is even for. The present article completes the picture by explaining the fundamental processes of believing that underpin all they say, and more. The keyword for the processes of believing is the term credition, a neologistic variant of credible or believable. This article elaborates how believing processes make possible religious, esoteric, and logical and evidence-based beliefs; where they come from and how they are constructed: and what they are good for, i.e., why humans do what is called believing at all.

References

Alcock, J. E. (2018). Belief: What it means to believe and why our convictions are so compelling. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.

American Psychiatry Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC, American Psychiatry Association. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

Amos, A. J. (2012). Call stories III. Islam. In H.-J. Klauck, V. Leppin, B. McGinn, C.-L. Seow, H. Spieckermann, B. D. Walfish, & E. J. Ziolkowski (Eds.) Encyclopedia of the Bible and its reception (vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.1515/EBR.callstories

Angel, H.-F. (2013). Religiosity. In A. L. C. Runehov, & L. Oviedo (Eds.). Encyclopedia of sciences and religion (vol. 4, pp. 2012–2014). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_1503

———. (2020). A history of the evolution of religion: From religion to religiosity to the processes of believing. In J. R. Feierman, & L. Oviedo (Eds.). The evolution of religion, religiosity, and theology (pp. 87-103). London: Routledge.

———. (2021a). Credition: Processes of believing (website since 2011). University of Graz, Austria. https://credition.uni-graz.at/de/

Angel, H.-F. (2021b). A process of merging the interior and exterior reality: A short view on the structure of credition. In M.-T. Teixeira, M. Reker, & A. Berve (Eds). Mind in nature: Bridging process philosophy and neoplatonism (pp. 201–219). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.

Angel, H.-F., Oviedo, L., Paloutzian, R. F., Runehov, A. L. C., & Seitz, R. J. (Eds.). (2017). Processes of believing: The acquisition, maintenance, and change in creditions. Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50924-2

Angel, H.-F., & Seitz, R. J. (2016). Process of believing as fundamental brain function: The concept of credition. Sigmund Freud University Research Bulletin, 3, 1-20; DOI 10.15135/2016.4.1.1-20

Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends Cognitive Science, 20(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.004

Belzen, J. A. (2010). Religion and self: Notions from a cultural psychological perspective. Pastoral Psychology, 59, 199–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-009-0204-z

Bird, G., & Viding, E. (2014). The self to other model of empathy: Providing a new framework for understanding empathy impairments in psychopathy, autism, and alexithymia. Neuroscience Biobehavioural Reviews, 47, 520–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.021

Cardeña, E., Lynn, S. J., & Krippner, S. (2014). Introduction: Anomalous experiences in perspective. In E. Cardeña, S. J. Lynn, & S. Krippner (Eds.). Varieties of anomalous experience: Examining the scientific evidence (2nd ed., pp. 3–20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14258-001

Carpendale, J. I., & Hammond, S.I. (2016). The development of moral sense and moral thinking. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 28, 743–747. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000412

Churchland, P. S., & Churchland, P. M. (2013). What are beliefs? In F. Krueger, & J. Grafman (Eds.). The neural basis of human belief systems (pp. 1–17). Hove, New York: Taylor & Fancis.

Coltheart, M. (2015). Phenomenological and neurocognitive perspectives on polythematic and monothematic delusions. World Psychiatry, 14, 186–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20214

Coltheart, M., Langdon, R., & McKay, R. (2011). Delusional belief. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 62, 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131622

Connors, M. H., & Halligan, P. W. (2020). Delusions and theories of belief. Conscious Cognition, 81, 102935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2020.102935

Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: G.P. Putnam.

Devinski, O., & Lai, G. (2008). Spirituality and religion in epilepsy. Epilepsy and Behavior, 12, 636–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2007.11.011

Fivush, R., Habermas, T., Waters, T. E. A., & Zaman, W. (2011). The making of autobiographical memory: Intersections of culture, narratives and identity. International Journal of Psychology, 46, 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.596541

Frith, C. (2005). The neural basis of hallucination and delusions. Comtes Rendus Biology, 328, 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2004.10.012

Gamsakhurdia, V. L. (2019). Towards the systematic theory of imagination: “Old melody in a new song: Aesthetics and art of psychology”, by: Tateo, Luca (Ed.). Integrative. Psychological and Behavioral Science, 53(3), 558–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-09481-8

Gelpi, R., Cunningham, W. A., & Buchsbaum, D. (2019). Belief as a non-epistemic adaptive benefit. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6ythf

Han, S., & Ma, Y. (2015). A culture-behavior-brain loop model of human development. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1, 666-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.010

Harris, S., Sheth, A., & Cohen, M. S. (2007). Functional neuroimaging of belief, disbelief, and uncertainty. Annals of Neurology, 63, 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21301

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0140525X0999152X Epub 2010 Jun 15

Howlett, J. R. & Paulus, M. P. (2015). The neural basis of testable and non-testable beliefs. PLoS ONE, 10: e0124596. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124596

Leicester, J. (2008). The nature and purpose of belief. Journal of Mind Behavior, 29, 217–238. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43854216

Lindeman, M., & Svedholm, A. (2012). What’s in a term? Paranormal, superstitious, magical and supernatural beliefs by any other name would mean the same. Review of General Psychology, 16(3), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027158

Luhrmann T. A. (2012). When God talks back: Understanding the American evangelical relationship with God. New York: Knopf. https://doi.org/10.24260/alalbab.v1i1.16

———. (2020). How God becomes real: Kindling the presence of invisible others. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Markman, K. D., Proulx, T., & Lindberg, M. L. (Eds.). (2013). The psychology of meaning. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14040-000

McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020). Hearing voices and other matters of the mind: What mental abnormalities can teach us about religions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190091149.001.0001

Novum Testamentum Graece (2012). Ed. By Nestle, E., Aland B., Aland K., 28th edition. Stuttgart 2012: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft. https://www.bibelwissenschaft.de/online-bibeln/septuaginta-lxx/lesen-im-bibeltext/

Oakley, D.A. & Halligan, P. (2017). Chasing the rainbow: The non-conscious nature of being. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1924. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01924

Old Testament English. King James Version. https://www.o-bible.com/kjv.html

Oviedo, L., & Szocik, K. (2020). Religious and other beliefs: how much specificity? Sage Open, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019898849

Paloutzian, R. F. & Mukai, K. J. (2017). Believing, remembering, and imagining: The roots and fruits of meanings made and remade. In H.-F. Angel, L. Oviedo, R. F. Paloutzian, A. L. C. Runehov, & R. J. Seitz. (Eds.). Processes of believing: The acquisition, maintenance, and change in creditions (pp. 39–49). Dordrecht, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50924-2_3

Paloutzian, R. F. & Park, C. L. (2014) Religiousness and spirituality: The psychology of multilevel meaning-making behavior. Religion Brain Behavior, 5, 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2014.891254

Paloutzian, R. F., Seitz, R. J., & Angel, H.-F. (2021). The processes of believing and communicating with the unseen. In T. Plante & G. Schwartz (Eds.). Human interaction with the divine, the sacred, and the deceased: Psychological, scientific, and theological perspectives. London: Routledge.

Park, C. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018301

Plante, T., & Schwartz, G. (Eds.). (2021). Human interaction with the divine, the sacred, and the deceased: Psychological, scientific, and theological perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.

Schmack, K., & Sterzer, P. (2019). Delusions: Sticking with conclusions. Brain, 142 (6), 1497–1502. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz092

Schwitzgebel E. (2015). Belief. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/belief/

Seitz, R. J. (2021). Beliefs: A challenge in neuropsychological disorders. Journal of Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12249

Seitz, R. J., & Angel, H.-F. (2014). Psychology of religion and spirituality: Meaning-making and processes of believing. Religion, Brain, and Behavior, 5(2), 118–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2014.891249

———. (2020). Belief formation – a driving force for brain evolution. Brain & Cognition, 140, 105548, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105548

Seitz, R. J., Franz, M., & Azari, N. P. (2009). Value judgments and self-control of action: The role of the medial frontal cortex. Brain Research Reviews, 60, 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2009.02.003

Seitz, R. J., Paloutzian, R. F., & Angel, H-F. (2017). Processes of believing: Where do they come from? What are they good for? F1000Research, 5:2573, 1-21 (doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9773.2). https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9773.2

———. (2018). From believing to belief: A general theoretical model. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(9), 1254–1264. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01292

———. (2019). Believing is representation mediated by the dopamine brain system. European Journal of Neuroscience, 49, 1212–1214. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14317

Septuaginta (2014). Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft. A. Rahlfs, & R. Hanhart, (Eds.). Editio altera, 4th edition. Stuttgart: (online-version: https://www.bibelwissenschaft.de/online-bibeln/septuaginta-lxx/lesen-im-bibeltext/).

Sharpe, E. J. (1983). Understanding religion. London: Duckworth.

Smith, W. C. (1962). The meaning and end of religion. Minneapolis: Macmillan.

Spittler, J. E. (2012). Conversion I. New Testament. In H.-J. Klauck, V. Leppin, B. McGinn, C.-L. Seow, H. Spieckermann, B. D. Walfish, & E. J. Ziolkowski (Eds.) Encyclopedia of the Bible and its reception (vol. 5, pp. 708–712). https://doi.org/10.1515/ebr.conversion

Sweeney, M. A. (2012): Call stories I. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament. In H.-J. Klauck, V. Leppin, B. McGinn, C.-L. Seow, H. Spieckermann, B. D. Walfish, & E. J. Ziolkowski (Eds.) Encyclopedia of the Bible and its reception (vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.1515/EBR.callstories

Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

———. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

Waters, F., Bom, J. D., Dang-Vu, T. T., Cheyne, A. J., Alderson-Day, B., Woodruff, P. & Collerton, D. (2016). What is the link between hallucinations, dreams, and hypnagogic-hypnopompic experiences? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 42(5), 1098–1109. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbw076

Waters, F., & Fernybough, C. (2017). Hallucinations: A systematic review of points of similarity and difference across diagnostic classes. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 43, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbw132

Watson, D. F. (2012): Call stories II. New Testament. In H.-J. Klauck, V. Leppin, B. McGinn, C.-L. Seow, H. Spieckermann, B. D. Walfish, & E. J. Ziolkowski (Eds.) Encyclopedia of the Bible and its reception (vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.1515/EBR.callstories

Wegner, D. M. (2003). The mind’s best trick: How we experience conscious will. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(2), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00002-0

Zimmerman, A. Z. (2018). Belief: A pragmatic picture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198809517.001.0001

Published

2021-08-03

How to Cite

Seitz, R. J. ., Angel, H.-F. ., & Paloutzian, R. F. . (2021). The Processes of Believing, Mental Abnormalities, and Other Matters of the Mind: Where Do They Come From? What Are They Good For?. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 7(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.19559

Issue

Section

Book Panel