Reduced statement credibility in interpreter-mediated interviews
Findings of a quantitative analysis of written records of police–suspect investigative interviews in Switzerland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.18865Keywords:
police investigative interview, interpreter, statement credibility, questioning style, fragmentation of discourse, written recordAbstract
In this article, we examine whether the participation of an interpreter in police–suspect investigative interviews affects the perception of statement credibility based on the written record of the interview and, whether this relationship is influenced by the interaction style as depicted in the written record. This study thus addresses the question of whether the credibility problems observed in interpreter-mediated investigative interviews are carried forward to the case file and is based on the content analysis of 102 actual written records of police–suspect interviews conducted in Switzerland. Our results show, first, that written suspect statements are indeed considered to be less credible when an interpreter participates in the interview. Second, this effect is mediated by the questioning style and the fragmentation of discourse. According to the written records of interpreter-mediated interviews, interviewers use a more controlling questioning style and suspects provide shorter answers, which in turn results in reduced statement credibility.
References
Amado, B. G., Arce, R. and Fariña, F. (2015) Undeutsch hypothesis and criteria based content analysis: a meta-analytic review. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context 7: 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.11.002
Angermeyer, P. (2008) Creating monolingualism in the multilingual courtroom. Sociolinguistic Studies 2: 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v2i3.385
Angermeyer, P. (2013) Multilingual speakers and language choice in the legal sphere. Applied Linguistics Review 4: 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2013-0005
Angermeyer, P. (2015) Speak English or What? Codeswitching and Interpreter Use in New York City Courts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baldwin, J. and Bedward, J. (1991) Summarising tape recordings of police interviews. Criminal Law Review (September): 671–679.
Bennett, L. and Feldman, M. (1981) Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers.
Berk-Seligson, S. (2009) Coerced Confessions: The Discourse of Bilingual Police Interrogations. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Blackstock, J., Cape, E., Hodgson, J., Ogorodova, A. and Spronken, T. (2014) Inside Police Custody: An Empirical Account of Suspects’ Rights in Four Jurisdictions. Cambridge: Intersentia.
Böser, U. (2013) ‘So tell me what happened!’: interpreting the free recall segment of the investigative interview. Translation and Interpreting Studies 8: 112–136. https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.8.1.06bos
Bull, R. and Milne, R. (2004) Attempts to improve the police interviewing of suspects. In G. D. Lassiter (ed.) Interrogations, Confessions, and Entrapment 181–196. New York: Kluwer Academic.
Capus, N. and Stoll, M. (2013) Lesen und Unterzeichnen von Einvernahmeprotokollen im Vorund im Hauptverfahren: Anmerkungen zur Revision der Schweizerischen Strafprozessordnung aus Sicht der rechtswissenschaftlichen und kriminologischen Protokollforschung [Reading and signing records of investigative interviews in preliminary and main proceedings: notes on the revision of the Swiss Criminal Procedure Code from the perspective of legal and criminological research on written records]. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 131: 195–217. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845246277-131
Capus, N., Stoll, M. and Suri, M. (2017) Protokollstile im institutionellen Kontext: Mittelbarkeit der Beweiserhebung und Verlaufsprotokolle von Einvernahmen [Styles of written records of investigative interviews: empirical analysis of the influence of the institutional context in proceedings relying on indirect evidence-gathering]. Revue Pénal Suisse 135: 1–31.
Capus, N., Stoll, M. and Vieth, M. (2014) Protokolle von Vernehmungen im Vergleich und Rezeptionswirkungen in Strafverfahren [Records of investigative interviews in comparison and reception-oriented impacts in criminal procedures]. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 34: 225–252. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfrs-2014-1-212
Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Danet, B. and Bogoch, B. (1980) Fixed fight or free-for-all? An empirical study of combativeness in the adversary system of justice. British Journal of Law and Society 7: 36–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/1409753
de Keijser, J., Malsch, M., Kranendonk, R. and de Gruijter, M. (2012) Written records of police interrogation: differential registration as determinant of statement credibility and interrogation quality. Psychology, Crime and Law 18: 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2010.526119
Fowler, Y. (2003) Taking an intepreted witness statement at the police station: what did the witness actually say? In L. Brunette, G. L. Bastin and I. Hemlin (eds) The Critical Link 3. Interpreters in the Community 195–209. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Garfinkel, H. (1967) Common sense knowledge of social structures: the documentary method of interpretation in lay and professional fact finding. In H. Garfinkel (ed.) Studies in Ethnomethodology 76–103. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Goodman-Delahunty, J. and Martschuk, N. (2016) Risks and benefits of interpreter-mediated police interviews. Journal of Criminal Justice and Security 18: 451–471.
Grant, T., Taylor, J., Oxburgh, G. and Myklebust, T. (2016) Exploring types and functions of questions in police interviews. In G. Oxburgh, T. Myklebust, T. Grant and R. Milne (eds) Communication in Investigative and Legal Contexts 17–38. Chichester: Wiley.
Griffiths, A. and Milne, R. (2006) Will it all end in tiers? Police interviews with suspects in Britain. In T. Williamson (ed.) Investigative Interviewing: Rights, Research and Regulation 167–189. Cullompton: Willan.
Harris, S. (2001) Fragmented narratives and multiple tellers: witness and defendant accounts in trials. Discourse Studies 3: 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445601003001003
Haviland, J. B. (2003) Ideologies of language: some reflections on language and U.S. law. American Anthropologist 105: 764–774. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2003.105.4.764
Haworth, K. (2006) The dynamics of power and resistance in police interview discourse. Discourse and Society 17: 739–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506068430
Haworth, K. (2013) Audience design in the police interview: the interactional and judicial consequences of audience orientation. Language in Society 42: 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404512000899
Hohl Zürcher, F. and Capus, N. (in press) Communicative (inter-)action transcending the police investigative interview room. Language and Law.
Huber, T. (2010) Drum prüfe, wer sich bindet. MDÜ: Fachzeitschrift für Dolmetscher und Übersetzer 24–6.
Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R. A. and Redlich, A. D. (2010) Police-induced confessions: risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior 34: 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6
Kaufmann, A. (2013) Das Unmittelbarkeitsprinzip und die Folgen seiner Einschränkung in der Schweizerischen Strafprozessordnung. Zürich: Schulthess.
Komter, M. (2002) The suspect’s own words: the treatment of written statements in Dutch courtrooms. Forensic Linguistics: The International Journal of Speech Language and the Law 9: 168–192. https://doi.org/10.1558/sll.2002.9.2.168
Komter, M. (2005) Understanding problems in an interpreter-mediated police interrogation. In S. Burns (ed.) Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, vol. 6: Ethnographies of Law and Social Control 203–224. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Komter, M. (2006) From talk to text: the interactional construction of a police record. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39: 201–228. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3903_2
Komter, M. (2012) The career of a suspect’s statement: talk, text, context. Discourse Studies 14: 731–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612457486
Komter, M. (2019) The Suspect’s Statement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kozin, A., Hannken-Illjes, K. and Scheffer, T. (2010) Criminal Defence and Procedure. Comparative Ethnographies in the United Kingdom, Germany, and the United States. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Krippendorff, K. (2004) Content Analysis. An Introduction to its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Landis, J. R. and Koch, G. G. (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Morris, R. (1995) The moral dilemmas of court interpreting. The Translator 1: 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.1995.10798948
Nakane, I. (2014) Interpreter-Mediated Police Interviews: A Discourse-Pragmatic Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ng, K. H. (2009) The Common Law in Two Voices: Language, Law, and the Postcolonial Dilemma in Hong Kong. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Niehaus, M. and Schmidt-Hannisa, H.-W. (2005) Textsorte Protokoll. Ein Aufriss. In M. Niehaus and H.-W. Schmidt-Hannisa (eds) Das Protokoll. Kulturelle Funktionen einer Textsorte 7–23. Vienna: Peter Lang.
Norman, G. (2010) Likert scales, levels of measurement and the ‘laws’ of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education 15: 625–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-0109222-y
O’Barr, W. M. (1982) Linguistic Evidence: Language, Power, and Strategy in the Courtroom. New York: Academic Press.
Oxburgh, G., Myklebust, T. and Grant, T. (2010) The question of question types in police interviews: a review of the literature from a psychological and linguistic perspective. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 17: 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v17i1.45
Pennington, N. and Hastie, R. (1993) The story model for juror decision making. In R. Hastie (ed.) Inside the Juror: The Psychology of Juror Decision Making 192–221. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Preacher, K. J. and Hayes, A. F. (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36: 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03206553
Rycroft, R. (2011) Hidden penalties faced by non-English speakers in the UK criminal justice system: an interpreting perspective. In A. Wagner and L. Cheng (eds) Exploring Courtroom Discourse: The Language of Power and Control 209–225. Farnham/Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Scheffer, T. (1998) Übergänge von Wort und Schrift: zur Genese und Gestaltung von Anhörungsprotokollen im Asylverfahren. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 19: 230–265. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfrs-1998-0206
Wadensjö, C. (1998) Interpreting as Interaction. London/New York: Longman.
