Why Participation Matters to Understand Ritual Experience
Keywords:intersubjectivity, mediumistic consultation, participation, praying, ritual experience
Two cases in which researchers take part in religious ritual show how being a participant enhances the researcher’s understanding of what is happening. Through these cases the authors attempt to shed light on the methodological problems concerning the “intersubjectivity” of research on ritual. Ritual goes beyond the verbal and pulls bodily sensations, emotion and gestures into the domain of intersubjectivity established through fieldwork. Experiencing the emotional and physical sensations that accompany ritual give the researcher a clue as to what other participants experience. But maybe more importantly, the participation of the researcher also triggers reflections on the meaning and efficacy of the ritual. These verbalized interpretations of what has happened may further strengthen the researcher’s understanding. The authors argue that it is exactly through putting this intersubjectivity at the centre of both the actual fieldwork and the subsequent analysis that the ever flexible and contested nature of ritual and the dynamic tension between semantic and tacit meaning can be most fruitfully explored.
Boudewijnse, Barbara. 1995. “The Conceptualisation of Ritual: A History of its Problematic Aspects,” Jaarboek voor Liturgieonderzoek, 11, 31–53.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Everson, Michael. 1991. “The Study of Ritual as an Aspect of Human Religiosity,” Mankind Quarterly, 32.1-2, 57–75.
Goody, Jack. 1977. “Against ‘Ritual’: Loosely Structured Thoughts on a Loosely Defined Topic,” in Sally F. Moore and Barbara G. Myerhoff, eds. Secular Ritual. Assen: Van Gorcum, 25– 35.
Humphrey, Caroline, and James Laidlaw. 1994. The Archetypal Actions of Ritual: A Theory of Ritual Illustrated by the Jain Rite of Worship. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Jackson, Michael. 1989. Paths towards a Clearing: Radical Empiricism and Ethnographic Inquiry. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Knibbe, Kim. 2007. “Faith in the Familiar: Continuity and Change in Religious Practices and Moral Orientations in the South of Limburg, the Netherlands.” Unpublished PhD dissertation; Amsterdam: VU University.
Knibbe, K., and P. Versteeg. 2008. “Asessing Phenomenology in Anthropology: Lessons from the Study of Religion and Experience,” Critique of Anthropology, 28.1, 47–62. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/0308275X07086557
Knibbe, Kim, and Iti Westra. 2006. “Van ongeloof naar ‘zeker weten’: Betekenisgeving en legitimatie in de context van het fenomeen Jomanda,” Tijdschrift Sociale Wetenschappen, 46.2, 75–93.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1984. Time and Narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stringer, Martin. 1999. On the Perception of Worship. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press.
Turner, Victor. 1967. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaka: Cornell University Press.
Van der Meulen, Marten. 2006. “Vroom in de Vinex: Kerk en civil society in Leidsche Rijn.” Unpublished PhD dissertation. Amsterdam: VU University.
How to Cite
© Equinox Publishing Ltd.
For information regarding our Open Access policy, click here.